Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 27: External Donor Funding to PNGOs Working in Social Service-Based Development (1999-2008) 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Health Services Disabled Care Children's Activities Eldery Care Family Planning Youth and Sports Source: MAS, 2009 – Donor Survey 3.7 Tracking Externally Funded PNGO Activities by Target Area One of the aims of our donor survey was to look at how externally funded PNGO activities were distributed according to target areas: Urban, Rural and Refugee 40 . We do this by looking at the distribution of the Palestinian population, PNGO HQs and external funding to target populations. 3.7.1 Distribution of the Palestinian Population and PNGOs by Target Area The previous MAS mappings of PNGOs in 2001 and 2007 have provided us with snapshots of the distribution of local organizations among the different target areas, as well as the percentage of external aid these PNGOs receive in comparison to their counterparts. Figure 28: Distribution of the Palestinian Population vs. PNGOs HQs by Target Area 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Population (1997) PNGO HQ Location (1999) Population (2007) PNGO HQ Location (2006) Urban Rural Refugee Sources: PCBS, 2002 and 2007 Census. MAS, 2001 and 2007 Mapping of PNGOs in the WB&GS 40 Official PCBS definitions of these populations can be found in the glossary at the back of the book. 44
The following Figure 28 compares the distribution of PNGOs with that of the Palestinian population as a whole. Though at a glance it appears that the distribution of PNGOs aligns with the distribution of the population, there are slight differences. While rural areas are almost exactly aligned, the number of PNGOs operating in urban areas is higher than the percentage of Palestinians living there, with the opposite being true of refugees. 3.7.2 External Aid to PNGOs versus Palestinian Demographics The following Figure 29 compares our survey results with the Palestinian Population distribution, the distribution of PNGOs and the distribution of those under the poverty line by target population. We also looked into the differences in funding to target populations between governmental and nongovernmental sources. Urban – While the percentage of Palestinians living in urban areas in 2007 was 53.1%, over half of them (50.6%) are under the poverty line. In spite of this, Urban Palestinians only received 38% of the total externally funded PNGO projects, with a marked difference between Governmental (49%) and INGO donors (32%). Rural – The percentage of Palestinians living in rural areas in 2007 was approximately 31%, 29.8% of them live below the poverty line. In spite of these two facts, rural Palestinians receive 41% of total externally funded projects managed through PNGOs, with only a slight difference between Governmental (34.8%) and INGO donors (44.5%). Figure 29: External Donor Funding to Target Population (2008) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Palestinian Population (2007) Distribution of Poor (2004) PNGO HQ Location (2006) External Aid Distribution to PNGOs (2008) Urban Rural Refugee Sources: Palestinian Population statistics are taken from PCBS (2007). Palestinian Poverty Distribution was calculated on the basis of consumption from PCBS (2004). External aid Distribution – MAS, 2009 – Donor Survey Refugee – While comprising 15.9% of the total population in the WB&GS, 19.6% of them live below the poverty line. 21% of all external aid channeled through PNGOs targets the refugees, with a marked difference between Governmental 41 (16%) and INGO donors (23.8%). 3.7.3 Tracking External Funding to PNGOs by Target Area (1999 -2008) The following section focuses on the distribution of external aid to PNGO projects according to the target area of the project’s implementation over ten years. According to our survey results, external aid to PNGO projects targeting urban populations rose from 2000 to 2003, before remaining steady just below 40% of the total, 13% lower than the Palestinian percentage of urban inhabitants. External aid to PNGO projects targeting rural populations is consistently the highest, garnering 42.2% of aid in 2000 and 2007, while only comprising 31% of the total population in 2007. This is in large part due to the scale of projects targeting urban areas versus rural, the latter receiving more large-scale assistance in terms of infrastructure. 41 While Governmental donors channel a smaller percentage of their aid through PNGOs to the refugee population than INGO donors, the former invest heavily in this sector through support to UNRWA. 45
Page 1 and 2:
Tracking External Donor Funding to
Page 3 and 4:
Foreword Palestinian Non-Government
Page 5: Acknowledgements This publication a
Page 8 and 9: 3.10 The European Union Funding to
Page 10 and 11: Acronyms AFESD - Arab Fund for Econ
Page 12 and 13: Executive Summary Between 1999 and
Page 14 and 15: Due to the fact that the donors sam
Page 16 and 17: Year # of NGOs Returning data Table
Page 18 and 19: institutions, we looked to the annu
Page 20 and 21: Western support to the PNGO sector,
Page 22 and 23: Strip. In the West Bank, President
Page 24 and 25: Figure 3: Commitments versus Disbur
Page 26 and 27: Figure 6: Percentage of the Externa
Page 28 and 29: Table 6: Twenty Largest Donors to t
Page 30 and 31: 2.2.6.4 External Aid per capita in
Page 32 and 33: Table 9: Sector Working Groups and
Page 34 and 35: 2.3.4 The Question of Ownership in
Page 36 and 37: The Subsector Breakdown of the PRDP
Page 39 and 40: 3. Tracking of External Donor Fundi
Page 41 and 42: 3.1.2 External Aid to PNGOs as a Pe
Page 43 and 44: Figure 15: Number of Registered NGO
Page 45 and 46: Figure 17: Comparing the Percentage
Page 47 and 48: Governmental Donors As discussed in
Page 49 and 50: Table 14: Comparison of the Percent
Page 51 and 52: 3.6.4 Tracking External Aid to PNGO
Page 53 and 54: Enhancing Democracy Funding to Enha
Page 55: 3.6.4.5 External Funding to Social
Page 59 and 60: As Figure 32 shows, donor governmen
Page 61 and 62: In the Central West Bank, Ramallah
Page 63 and 64: While the Figure 35 shows a relativ
Page 65 and 66: Figure 38: The Location of Internat
Page 67 and 68: 3.8.7 In Focus: PNGO Hierarchies Th
Page 69 and 70: The OPEC Fund for International Dev
Page 71 and 72: According to the survey, external f
Page 73: Figure 45: Palestinian Population D
Page 76 and 77: esearch could be fed back into the
Page 78 and 79: Challand, Benoit (2005). “Looking
Page 80 and 81: Ministry of Planning (2008). Aid Ef
Page 83: Appendices 71
Page 87 and 88: I. Political Timeline 1991 1993 199
Page 89 and 90: Nov - Annapolis peace conference De
Page 91 and 92: Figure 1: Geography of West Bank an
Page 93 and 94: International Non-Governmental Orga
Page 95 and 96: Does international aid help to supp
Page 97 and 98: Table 3: International Donor Worker
Page 99 and 100: IV. Review of Welfare Study (1998)
Page 101 and 102: c. The donor agenda does not necess
Page 103 and 104: Even when donors were cooperative,
Page 105 and 106: Governorate or 2008 1999 2000 2001
Page 107 and 108:
Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Wh
Page 109 and 110:
Q18 Percentage distribution of the
Page 111 and 112:
Externally Funded PNGO Activity by
Page 113 and 114:
International Governmental Aid to P
Page 115 and 116:
External Aid and PNGO Activity by T
Page 117 and 118:
International Nongovernmental Aid D
Page 119 and 120:
International Aid Distribution by G
Page 121 and 122:
International Governmental Aid Dist
Page 123 and 124:
Distribution of PNGOs Based on Geog
Page 125:
Distribution of PNGOs by Governorat
show all

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?