09.01.2015 Views

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.6.4.5 <strong>External</strong> <strong>Funding</strong> to Social Service-Based<br />

PNGOs<br />

Health Services<br />

The percentage of PNGOs engaged in Health Services<br />

was at its peak in 2001 with the start of the Intifada, after<br />

which it declines sharply, over 10%, into 2002. From<br />

then on there is a steady decline, broken only by an<br />

increase in 2006, presumably from the shifting of some<br />

money out of the public health sector and into PNGOs.<br />

From 2007 to 2008, the funding remained at a steady<br />

15%.<br />

Unlike the overall trend and governmental donors, INGO<br />

funds declined straight through to 2008, without<br />

climbing in 2006 in response to the elections. The INGO<br />

donor sector also apportions a higher percentage of its<br />

aid to health related activities that the Governmental<br />

sector, presumably because the latter also funds the<br />

Palestinian Ministry of Health (MoH).<br />

In 2006, MAS measured external financing to PNGOs in<br />

the Health Services sector as covering a total of 50.2% of<br />

their budgets. As many health INGOs offer their services<br />

at a price, the amount of self-financing in this sector is<br />

far higher than the others, with the exception of family<br />

planning.<br />

Elderly Care<br />

According to our survey, Elderly Care is not a PNGO<br />

sector heavily funded by external donors. The data may<br />

also be open to the possibility of respondents including<br />

Elderly Care projects that are part of larger health<br />

programs into the Health Services sector.<br />

In 2006, Elderly Care PNGOs only received 37.7% of<br />

their budget from international aid. In contrast to most<br />

other PNGOs, this sector receives a high percentage of<br />

aid from self-financing revenues (20%), local sources<br />

(28.3%) and from the Diaspora (11.1%) (MAS,<br />

2007:80).<br />

Disabled Care<br />

After the height of the Intifada, and presumably in the<br />

wake of intense violence, the Disability Care sector<br />

began to grow. It peaked in 2003 at 6.74%, before<br />

remaining steady at around 5% of total external aid to<br />

PNGOs into 2008.<br />

Unlike the overall trend in aid, INGO donor funding to<br />

PNGOs working in the disabilities sector peaks in 2005,<br />

at the same time when Governmental funding is at an all<br />

time low, less than 1%. This could in part be due to the<br />

fact that Governmental donors had shifted so much of<br />

their funding into the sector of Human Rights,<br />

Democracy and Good Governance in 2005 in advance of<br />

the elections.<br />

Disabled Care received 42% of its funding from external<br />

aid in 2006 and a total of 31.9% of its funding from selffinancing<br />

- much like PNGOs engaged in the more<br />

general health sector (MAS, 2007:80).<br />

Family Planning<br />

According to our survey, external donor funding to<br />

PNGO programs in Family Planning is almost<br />

nonexistent. As we assume this is untrue, we suspect that<br />

a number of respondents allocated these projects to other<br />

sectors, such as Health Services or Women’s Affairs.<br />

However the low figures are not too far off when we<br />

look at the percentage of external aid in Family Planning<br />

PNGOs’ budgets in 2006. According to MAS survey of<br />

PNGOs in 2007, only 13.4% of funds came from abroad,<br />

while a full 78.4% of aid came from self-financing. 2005<br />

represents the peak in donor funding to the sector and the<br />

trend is mimicked by both Governmental and INGO<br />

donors.<br />

Children’s Activities<br />

<strong>External</strong> aid to PNGOs working in Children’s Activities<br />

decreased dramatically between 2001 and 2002. In 2003<br />

it began to recover dramatically, finally reaching its peak<br />

of 8.04% in 2004. Between 2004 and 2005 there was a<br />

dramatic drop in aid to the sector, presumably following<br />

a shift in funding toward the PA or into sectors such as<br />

Enhancing Democracy or Good Governance.<br />

Both Governmental and INGO donors generally follow<br />

the overall pattern of aid to the sector – with the former<br />

apportioning a higher percentage of its disbursements<br />

from 2003 forward. According to previous MAS<br />

mappings, 75.6% of the budgets of PNGOs working in<br />

Children’s Activities came from external aid (MAS,<br />

2007:80).<br />

Youth and Sports<br />

Unlike work with the children’s sector, Youth and Sports<br />

increased dramatically during the Intifada and peaked in<br />

2003 at 3.62% of total aid. Since 2003, funding to the<br />

sector has steadily declined. The increase in funding<br />

throughout the Intifada was due largely to INGO donors,<br />

who also apportioned a higher percentage of their aid to<br />

the sector in general.<br />

It is important to note that Youth and Sports<br />

organizations are the most numerous type of PNGO in<br />

the WB&GS, and at the same time, one of the sectors<br />

receiving the least amount of external aid. <strong>External</strong> aid<br />

made up 59.5% of Youth and Sport PNGO budgets in<br />

2006. Local funding to the sector is higher than any<br />

other, with the exception of elderly care, at 19.6% of<br />

their operating budgets (MAS, 2007:80).<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!