Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 44: Percentage of <strong>External</strong>ly Funded PNGO Activities by Target Population and Period 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1999-2000 2001-2005 2006-2008 Urban Rural Refugee All Source: MAS, 2009 – PNGO Survey Refugee target groups receive only a fraction of the total external aid to large PNGOs, with the highest percentage (11%) being in the second period. The high percentage of respondents choosing the ‘All Populations’ category is reflective of a sample weighted towards large PNGOs working at the national and seminational levels. We suspect however that the lower percentage of external funded PNGO activities targeting ‘all populations’ in the third period, reflects the better record keeping of PNGOs in more recent years, allowing them to better allocate their activities by target population. 3.11.3 Location of Large PNGO Project Implementation by Region and Period Our PNGO survey aimed to capture the changes in the geographic distribution of large PNGO project implementation on the regional level over the three periods of time, rather than the population of PNGOs as a whole. As the following table shows, there is a slight increase (12.4% to 14.8%) in large PNGO activity in the North WB during the second period, when the region underwent extreme economic and social destruction in Israel’s operation “Defensive Shield”. In the third period, the percentage returns to little over twelve, highlighting that within the West Bank, the north is the most under represented region in comparison to the population (24.3%). The Central WB sees a slight increase between the first and second periods, before declining again in the third period to around 11% of the total. As the Central WB constitutes 17.8% of the total Palestinian population, it could be viewed as under represented in terms of externally funded PNGO activities. However, we believe this to be untrue as a number of the organizations working at the All Palestine levels are located in the Central WB and carry out activities there, as well as the rest of the WB&GS. The distribution of externally funded PNGO activities in the South WB increases steadily over the three periods, from 14.8% to 18.9%. This is precisely the distribution of the population in the region. The Gaza Strip is home to 39% of the Palestinian population in the WB&GS and 29% of its activities. Like the other regions, the Gaza Strip does receive a portion of the aid designated as ‘All Palestine’. 60
Figure 45: Palestinian Population Distribution versus the Location of PNGOs and their Project Implementation by Region and Period (2008) 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% N WB C WB S WB GS All Population Distribution PNGO Distribution PNGO Project Implementation Source: MAS, 2009 – PNGO Survey 61
Page 1 and 2:
Tracking External Donor Funding to
Page 3 and 4:
Foreword Palestinian Non-Government
Page 5:
Acknowledgements This publication a
Page 8 and 9:
3.10 The European Union Funding to
Page 10 and 11:
Acronyms AFESD - Arab Fund for Econ
Page 12 and 13:
Executive Summary Between 1999 and
Page 14 and 15:
Due to the fact that the donors sam
Page 16 and 17:
Year # of NGOs Returning data Table
Page 18 and 19:
institutions, we looked to the annu
Page 20 and 21:
Western support to the PNGO sector,
Page 22 and 23: Strip. In the West Bank, President
Page 24 and 25: Figure 3: Commitments versus Disbur
Page 26 and 27: Figure 6: Percentage of the Externa
Page 28 and 29: Table 6: Twenty Largest Donors to t
Page 30 and 31: 2.2.6.4 External Aid per capita in
Page 32 and 33: Table 9: Sector Working Groups and
Page 34 and 35: 2.3.4 The Question of Ownership in
Page 36 and 37: The Subsector Breakdown of the PRDP
Page 39 and 40: 3. Tracking of External Donor Fundi
Page 41 and 42: 3.1.2 External Aid to PNGOs as a Pe
Page 43 and 44: Figure 15: Number of Registered NGO
Page 45 and 46: Figure 17: Comparing the Percentage
Page 47 and 48: Governmental Donors As discussed in
Page 49 and 50: Table 14: Comparison of the Percent
Page 51 and 52: 3.6.4 Tracking External Aid to PNGO
Page 53 and 54: Enhancing Democracy Funding to Enha
Page 55 and 56: 3.6.4.5 External Funding to Social
Page 57 and 58: The following Figure 28 compares th
Page 59 and 60: As Figure 32 shows, donor governmen
Page 61 and 62: In the Central West Bank, Ramallah
Page 63 and 64: While the Figure 35 shows a relativ
Page 65 and 66: Figure 38: The Location of Internat
Page 67 and 68: 3.8.7 In Focus: PNGO Hierarchies Th
Page 69 and 70: The OPEC Fund for International Dev
Page 71: According to the survey, external f
Page 76 and 77: esearch could be fed back into the
Page 78 and 79: Challand, Benoit (2005). “Looking
Page 80 and 81: Ministry of Planning (2008). Aid Ef
Page 83: Appendices 71
Page 87 and 88: I. Political Timeline 1991 1993 199
Page 89 and 90: Nov - Annapolis peace conference De
Page 91 and 92: Figure 1: Geography of West Bank an
Page 93 and 94: International Non-Governmental Orga
Page 95 and 96: Does international aid help to supp
Page 97 and 98: Table 3: International Donor Worker
Page 99 and 100: IV. Review of Welfare Study (1998)
Page 101 and 102: c. The donor agenda does not necess
Page 103 and 104: Even when donors were cooperative,
Page 105 and 106: Governorate or 2008 1999 2000 2001
Page 107 and 108: Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Wh
Page 109 and 110: Q18 Percentage distribution of the
Page 111 and 112: Externally Funded PNGO Activity by
Page 113 and 114: International Governmental Aid to P
Page 115 and 116: External Aid and PNGO Activity by T
Page 117 and 118: International Nongovernmental Aid D
Page 119 and 120: International Aid Distribution by G
Page 121 and 122: International Governmental Aid Dist
Page 123 and 124:
Distribution of PNGOs Based on Geog
Page 125:
Distribution of PNGOs by Governorat
show all

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?