09.01.2015 Views

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

Tracking External Donor Funding.pdf - NDC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

When asked whether international aid contributes to social justice, only 32% responded positively, while the<br />

remainder chose no.<br />

MAS 2009 <strong>Donor</strong> Straw Poll<br />

In order to supplement our quantitative survey, MAS approached donors with a follow-up straw poll. These brief<br />

surveys were given anonymously to international aid agency employees who were asked to respond according to their<br />

opinions, as opposed to the position of their organization. It should be noted that this survey was not of adequate size,<br />

30 people, to be taken as more than indicative. It should also be noted that we expect many of the responses to have<br />

been affected by the recent war on the Gaza Strip, especially the question asking about the need for aid based on<br />

geography.<br />

The table below shows aid workers’ perceptions of the sectors most in need of international funding in the final opinion<br />

column. The columns 2006 – 2008 represent the actual disbursements of international aid by sector as captured in our<br />

survey.<br />

Table 2: International <strong>Donor</strong> Worker Perceptions<br />

versus Organizational Trends by Sector<br />

Sector 2006 2007 2008 Opinion<br />

Children’s Activities 2.31% 2.74% 3.73% 1.4%<br />

Charity & Relief 5.21% 4.04% 8.88% 2.9%<br />

Elderly Care 0.22% 1%<br />

Family Planning 0.53% 0.08% 1.70% 1.9%<br />

Liberal Arts Education 5.40% 6.22% 8.25% 1.9%<br />

Rural Development 10.93% 15.88% 10.17% 14.8%<br />

Water and Environment 5.47% 2.38% 3.51% 15.2%<br />

Health Services 18.74% 15.45% 14.72% 5.7%<br />

Research 2.05% 1.26% 3.00% 1%<br />

Disabled Care 5.05% 4.68% 3.83% 1%<br />

Vocational Training 2.85% 2.04% 3.06% 4.8%<br />

Religious Activities 0.03%<br />

Scientific Education 1.87% 4.28% 2.61% 4.8%<br />

Women’s Affairs 7.29% 8.97% 7.99% 10%<br />

Human Rights 10.21% 10.83% 10.60% 15.7%<br />

Enhancing Democracy 6.65% 4.81% 3.58% 3.8%<br />

Good Governance 8.73% 9.32% 7.84% 14.1%<br />

Youth and Sports 2.66% 1.64% 1.54% 1.9%<br />

Other 4.04% 5.35% 4.78%<br />

Total 100% 100% 100% 100%<br />

Note: Of the 30 international aid workers given the survey, 29 returned<br />

completed questionnaires.<br />

Empty Cells are equal to 0% and numbers for the opinions are rounded to the<br />

nearest tenth of a percent.<br />

The most dramatic differences between international agency worker perceptions and the reality on the ground are in the<br />

sectors of Charity and Relief, Water, Health, Liberal Arts Education, Human Rights and Good Governance. If worker<br />

perceptions were to become reality in 2009, Charity and relief would decrease by nearly 2/3, as would funds to the<br />

Health Sector. Water would nearly quintuple its funding while Human rights would increase by a third. Other sectors<br />

that international workers would emphasize more than their organizations were: Youth, Governance, Democracy,<br />

Women, Scientific Education, Rural Development, Vocational Training and Elderly Care. Other sectors that these<br />

workers would de-emphasize were: Children’s Activities, Liberal Arts, Research and Disabled Care.<br />

5<br />

For more analysis on this subject, see: Brynen 1995; Hanafi and Tabar 2004, 2005; Said 2005; and Taylor 1997.<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!