13.01.2015 Views

FORM 20-F Grupo Casa Saba, S.A.B. de C.V.

FORM 20-F Grupo Casa Saba, S.A.B. de C.V.

FORM 20-F Grupo Casa Saba, S.A.B. de C.V.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table of Contents<br />

All significant transactions between related parties have been eliminated in the preparation of the information by operating segments. At December 31, <strong>20</strong>11, <strong>20</strong>10 and <strong>20</strong>09 the<br />

information was as follows:<br />

<strong>20</strong>11 <strong>20</strong>10 <strong>20</strong>09<br />

Item<br />

Retail<br />

pharmacies<br />

Distribution<br />

business Total<br />

Retail<br />

pharmacies<br />

Business<br />

distribution Total<br />

Retail<br />

pharmacies<br />

Distribution<br />

business Total<br />

Net sales Ps. 24,058,753 22,509,473 46,568,226 8,586,462 25,657,7<strong>20</strong> 34,244,182 3,224,313 26,567,344 29,791,657<br />

Operating<br />

income 426,961 1,139,506 1,566,467 126,147 558,451 684,598 360,747 529,978 890,725<br />

Depreciation<br />

and<br />

amortization 378,052 61,688 439,740 114,639 76,366 191,005 34,675 73,984 108,659<br />

EBITDA 805,012 363,705 1,168,717 240,786 634,817 875,603 395,422 603,962 999,384<br />

At December 31, <strong>20</strong>11, and <strong>20</strong>10, the selected information of balance sheet by eliminating intercompany balances was as follows:<br />

<strong>20</strong>11 <strong>20</strong>10<br />

Retailer<br />

pharmacies<br />

Business<br />

distribution Total<br />

Retailer<br />

pharmacies<br />

Business<br />

distribution Total<br />

Current assets Ps. 6,212,516 13,277,579 19,490,095 5,954,685 12,739,508 18,694,193<br />

Noncurrent assets 5,984,315 6,486,653 12,470,968 6,176,706 6,441,812 12,618,518<br />

Total liabilities 10,222,881 14,691,503 24,914,384 9,770,292 14,459,571 24,229,861<br />

<strong>20</strong>. Contingencies and commitments:<br />

a) On February 12, <strong>20</strong>07, the Group filed appeals for constitutional relief with the Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Tax Court against the tax reform that binds taxpayers to <strong>de</strong>termine asset tax by applying<br />

the 1.25 percent annual rate to the average value of assets and not to reduce the value of <strong>de</strong>bts contracted from the taxable base, effective January 1, <strong>20</strong>07. In September <strong>20</strong>11, the<br />

Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Tax Court han<strong>de</strong>d down a favorable ruling in favor of the Group.<br />

b) On March 28, <strong>20</strong>08, the Mexican tax authorities issued an “invitation” to the Company to file an amen<strong>de</strong>d tax return of consolidated income tax for fiscal year <strong>20</strong>05 and prove<br />

that it ad<strong>de</strong>d the amount of certain prior year tax losses to consolidated taxable income for the same year. Previously, those tax losses had been reduced by the Group to <strong>de</strong>termine<br />

cumulative inventory, in accordance with the Income Tax Law. In May <strong>20</strong>08 and March <strong>20</strong>09, Management filed the amen<strong>de</strong>d income tax return that met with that<br />

invitation. Accordingly, there is no contingency payable by the Company. However, Management would carry out actions that would imply adoption of a criterion other than that of<br />

the tax authorities, which could have this matter solved in the Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Tax Court. In Management’s opinion, the Company is not bound to comply with the criterion set forth by the tax<br />

authorities as the Group has reasonable arguments to sustain its interpretation.<br />

In September <strong>20</strong>09, the Company filed a claim for a refund of the consolidated income tax payment improperly ma<strong>de</strong> in the amount of Ps. 149,294, due to the invitation<br />

abovementioned. On November 12, <strong>20</strong>09, the tax authorities ma<strong>de</strong> a partial refund in the amount of Ps. 26,4<strong>20</strong>. Subsequently, the tax authority rejected to refund the remaining<br />

amount. In February <strong>20</strong>10, Management filed an appeal for annulment against that resolution. Management estimates that there are reasonable elements for obtaining a result<br />

favorable to the Company’s interests.<br />

F-49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!