20.01.2015 Views

Debt: The First 5000 Years - autonomous learning

Debt: The First 5000 Years - autonomous learning

Debt: The First 5000 Years - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES 401<br />

cancel their debts in a circle. This might<br />

seem an extraneous point, but the circular<br />

cancellation of debts in this way seems<br />

to have been quite a common practice<br />

in much of history: see, for instance, the<br />

description of "reckonings" in chapter n<br />

below.<br />

59· I am not ascribing this position to<br />

the authors of the Brahmanas necessarily;<br />

only pursuing what I take to be the internal<br />

logic of the argument, in dialogue<br />

with its authors.<br />

6o. Malamoud 1983:32.<br />

61. Comte 1891:295<br />

62. In France, particularly by political<br />

thinkers like Alfred Fouille and Leon<br />

Bourgeois. <strong>The</strong> latter, leader of the Radical<br />

Party in the 189os, made the notion<br />

of social debt one of the conceptual<br />

foundations for what his philosophy of<br />

"solidarism"-a form of radical republicanism<br />

that, he argued, could provide a<br />

kind of middle-ground alternative to both<br />

revolutionary Marxism and free-market<br />

liberalism. <strong>The</strong> idea was to overcome the<br />

violence of class struggle by appealing to<br />

a new moral system based on the notion<br />

of a shared debt to society-of which the<br />

state, of course, was merely the administrator<br />

and representative (Hayward 1959,<br />

Donzelot 1994, Jobert 2003). Emile Durkheim<br />

too was a Solidarist politically.<br />

63. As a slogan, the expression is generally<br />

attributed to Charles Gide, the latenineteenth-century<br />

French cooperativist,<br />

but became common in Solidarist circles.<br />

It became an important principle in Turkish<br />

socialist circles at the time (Aydan<br />

2003), and, I have heard, though I have<br />

not been able to verify, in Latin America.<br />

Chapter Four<br />

1. Hart 1986:638.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> technical term for this is "fiduciarity,"<br />

the degree to which its value<br />

is based not on metal content but public<br />

trust. For a good discussion of the<br />

fiduciarity of ancient currencies, see Seaford<br />

2004:139-146. Almost all metal coins<br />

were overvalued. If the government set the<br />

value below that of the metal, of course,<br />

people would simply melt them down;<br />

if it's set at exactly the metal value, the<br />

results are usually deflationary. As Bruno<br />

<strong>The</strong>ret (2008:826-27) points out, although<br />

Locke's reforms, which set the value of<br />

the British sovereign at exactly its weight<br />

in silver, were ideologically motivated,<br />

they had disastrous economic effects. Obviously,<br />

if coinage is debased or the value<br />

otherwise set too high in relation to the<br />

metal content, this can produce inflation.<br />

But the traditional view, where, say, the<br />

Roman currency was ultimately destroyed<br />

by debasement, is clearly false, since it<br />

took centuries for inflation to occur (Ingham<br />

2004:102-3).<br />

3· Einzig 1949:104; similar gambling<br />

chits, in this case made of bamboo, were<br />

used in Chinese towns in the Gobi desert<br />

(ibid: 108).<br />

4· On English token money, see Williamson<br />

1889; Whiting 1971; Mathias<br />

1979b.<br />

5· On cacao, Millon 1955; on Ethopian<br />

salt money, Einzig 1949:123-26. Both Karl<br />

Marx (1857:223, 1867:182) and Max Weber<br />

(1978:673-74) were of the opinion that<br />

money had emerged from barter between<br />

societies, not within them. Karl Bucher<br />

(1904), and arguably Karl Polanyi (1968),<br />

held something close to this position, at<br />

least insofar as they insisted that modern<br />

money emerged from external exchange.<br />

Inevitably there must have been some sort<br />

of mutually reinforcing process between<br />

currencies of trade and the local accounting<br />

system. Insofar as we can talk about<br />

the "invention" of money in its modern<br />

sense, presumably this would be the place<br />

to look, though in places like Mesopotamia<br />

this must have happened long before<br />

the use of writing, and hence the history<br />

is effectively lost to us.<br />

6. Einzig (1949:266), citing Kulischer<br />

(1926:92) and Ilwof (1882:36).<br />

7· Genealogy of Morals, 2.8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!