REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PART II:<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Central European Free Trade Agreement was originally signed by Poland, Hungary, Czech<br />
and Slovak Republic in 1992. The objectives of that Agreement were: a) to promote,<br />
through the expansion of trade, the harmonious development of the economic relations<br />
between the CEFTA members and thus to foster in the members the advance of economic<br />
activity, the improvement of living and employment conditions, and increased productivity<br />
and financial stability; b) to provide fair conditions of competition for trade between the<br />
member countries; c) to contribute in this way, by the removal of barriers to trade, the<br />
harmonious development and expansion of world trade (Central European Free Trade<br />
Agreement, 1992, pp.2). CEFTA 2006 Agreement has expanded the list of objectives. The<br />
most important include: improvement of conditions for further promotion of investment,<br />
including foreign direct investment; expand trade in goods and services; provide appropriate<br />
protection of intellectual property rights in accordance with international standards; and to<br />
provide effective procedures for the implementation and application of this Agreement<br />
(Annex 1 CEFTA 2006, 2006, pp.3). The Agreement entered into force on 26 July 2007<br />
for five Parties - Albania, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro and UNMIK/Kosovo, while<br />
for Croatia it entered into force on 22 August, for Serbia on 24 October and for Bosnia<br />
and Herzegovina on 22 November 2007. Full implementation of CEFTA 2006 started at<br />
the end of 2007 (CEFTA 2006, 2009). Consequently, a long term analysis of the impact<br />
of the CEFTA 2006 Agreement on foreign direct investment and foreign trade among<br />
member countries is limited. The strengthening of economic ties in the region is of a great<br />
importance since the main goal of this integration is the preparation of business sectors for<br />
the competition in the EU. Products of CEFTA 2006 countries can withstand competition in<br />
the market of the region itself, but need additional adjustment to meet strict EU standards to<br />
compete alongside the products from the EU. Therefore, the cooperation for consolidation<br />
of competitiveness for their products in the joined EU market is necessary.<br />
Concerning investment, the principal competitive advantages lie in the low labor costs,<br />
flexible labor policy and increased future productivity potential. The region is especially<br />
appealing for its low labor costs. The SEE region trails behind other European countries in<br />
the quality of infrastructure, research and development (R&D) and governance. Even so,<br />
it is the continent’s most attractive region for establishing factories and other production<br />
units (FIAS, The Multi-donor Investment Climate Advisory Service of the World Bank<br />
Group, 2007, pp. 2).<br />
1. Basic macroeconomic indicators of CEFTA 2006 countries<br />
As already mentioned above, full implementation of the CEFTA 2006 Agreement started at<br />
the end of 2007. Member countries of this Agreement are: Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina,<br />
Croatia, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro and Serbia. When comparing some of their<br />
basic macroeconomic indicators it is evident that the indicators show different degree of<br />
coherence over the years and among countries. Indicators like inflation, current account<br />
balance, export (as the percentage of GDP) and FDI inflows show large oscillation over<br />
the past ten years, and they also differ from country to country in the region. One of the<br />
indicators that had shown great oscillations in the early nineties for all countries is the<br />
GDP growth rate. The annual GDP growth rate displayed great variation in that period and<br />
even after 2002. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the GDP growth rates in the period 1992-2008<br />
102