26.01.2015 Views

REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION

REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION

REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FDI FLOWS IN SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE<br />

for Privatization are amended, and it performs tasks in bankruptcy if the Bankruptcy<br />

Council appoints it to perform the tasks, and in accordance with the law which regulates<br />

the bankruptcy proceedings.<br />

The important amendment of the Law on Privatization refers to the large companies that<br />

are for sale, to which the state will write off debts to the state funds and public enterprises<br />

and make them much more attractive for potential investors. These debts would be settled<br />

later from the revenue accomplished by selling these companies. These measures should<br />

enable faster privatization of over-indebted companies, which carry most of the burden of<br />

excess labor. It is primarily about the public companies, whose successful privatization<br />

would provide the success of the entire process of restructuring the economy in Serbia. It is<br />

necessary to strengthen these companies and reduce the costs of their business. Therefore,<br />

it is necessary that the government and the competent ministries apply the strategy of<br />

restructuring public enterprises (the energy sector is the furthest one that they have gone<br />

to). The reduction of surplus labor force in these enterprises is announced, as well as in<br />

public administration. Social program, i.e. severance pay for these workers would be<br />

funded from the Transitional fund.<br />

The total inflow of foreign direct investment recorded by the National Bank of Serbia<br />

(NBS) includes revenues from privatization and the new foreign direct investment.<br />

The current statistics of foreign investment in Serbia are based on the records of capital<br />

transfers led by the NBS on the basis of information supplied by commercial banks and<br />

registers them as the inflow of FDI in cases in which the commercial banks, as the basis<br />

of payment, specify code 557 (foreign investment). The moment of recording the inflow<br />

is the one when the payment is realized, regardless of the contractual obligations. These<br />

statistics allow tracking the total inflow of foreign investment from year to year, as well<br />

as comparison of foreign investment in Serbia with foreign investment in other countries.<br />

However, on the basis of this statistics, the origin of capital by country of payment can<br />

be determined, which in many cases is not the actual country of the origin of the capital<br />

invested. Companies from the United States are dominant by the amount of investment in<br />

Serbia, which is achieved through their own companies - intermediaries. Available data<br />

provide analytical monitoring of foreign investment (by country of origin, activities in<br />

which foreign capital inflows, regions that are invested in), but still, it is necessary to<br />

improve the foreign investment statistics and the methodology of collecting data on foreign<br />

investment.<br />

Agency for Privatization notes the data on inflows from the sale of companies in the<br />

privatization process, as well as contractual obligations on the basis of investment and social<br />

programs. On that occasion, it particularly emphasizes the inflows that came from foreign<br />

customers, in other words value of contracts in which the customers are non-residential<br />

legal / natural persons. Data on privatization inflows, collected by the Agency for<br />

Privatization, do not include the amounts paid on the basis of the sale contracts that were<br />

later on broken. On the other hand, once recorded (contracted) investment responsibilities<br />

and obligations relating to the social programs are often not respected, especially regarding<br />

deadlines. The result of this is the lack of accurate and updated record of privatization<br />

inflows. If these data were reliable, from the total annual inflow of FDI the inflows of<br />

privatization could be subtracted and in such a way the annual amount of greenfield foreign<br />

investment could be received. Taking into account the very small number of greenfield<br />

projects, it can be estimated that greenfield investment in Serbia after 2000. has never<br />

exceeded the amount of 150 million dollars a year. This is certainly far from the development<br />

325

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!