1JZGauQ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4: CASE STUDY 1: THE ITALIAN/SLOVENIAN BORDER are told in other places along the border. Like a fable or story that projects some kind of moral lesson, it is not the content of the story itself that is important but rather what the story stands for, a way to relate to the border and to people on the other side. For Antonio it is also, most likely, a way to deal with his and his family’s traumatic past in relation to the border. Others have not felt the same need to relate to the border at all. For Angela, a woman in her early 30s brought up in Gorizia whom I also got in contact with through common friends, her interest and focus was always directed westwards, “…my feeling when I was young was to live at the end of something. Our region is at the ‘periphery’ of Italy, far away from the capital. My attention was all focussed towards the west, towards the rest of Italy, the rest of Western Europe and the ‘western world’” (Angela, 2008, pers. comm.). At a group interview conducted in Skofije 2008 with three women and four men in their late 70s and early 80s the early years of the border came back to life through their memories and stories. Many funny anecdotes were told and one of the ladies sang a song about American soldiers. There was a lot of laughter and only the occasional sad story. I wonder if the events were really this uncomplicated or if time passed had soften these people’s memories. I ask how they felt when the new border was installed after World War II. They were not worried or upset but they told me that compared to the Iron Curtain this was nothing. It was still possible to cross and there were no high concrete walls. Without reflecting on it they project the image of the Berlin Wall as being synonymous with the Iron Curtain. There were no such thing here, hence, they do not consider this to be part of the Iron Curtain. Antonio thinks the Italian/Yugoslavian border was part of the Iron Curtain, he says they were poor on the other side, and that they were communists, but Maria is not so sure. Andrej has a complex way of looking at the border in relationship to the Iron Curtain. For two days he drives me around the border areas. He stops and shows me different structures and sections of the border. He uses the term Iron Curtain a lot. He says things like “that watchtower was part of the Iron Curtain” or, “that’s where the Iron Curtain ran”. When our two day tour of the border areas is finished I ask him if he thinks this border was part of the Iron Curtain and he immediately answers no. I realise that Andrej in his capacity of museum director sees the Iron Curtain as something that sells from a heritage point of view but which also conflicts with his own experiences growing up by the border. The tourist value that is attached to the Iron Curtain is not farfetched. On the internet there are plenty of travel descriptions of people 113
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN claiming to be crossing the former Iron Curtain when they cross the Italian/Slovenian border. A group of British cyclists are hanging out in the Transalpine Square outside the Nova Gorica railway station waiting for a train. They take pictures of each other jumping over the border and standing with one foot in Italy and one in Slovenia. I ask them what the significance of the place is. “It’s pretty awesome that you can now just cross over what was once the Iron Curtain,” says one of the guys and makes an extra jump over the border line as if to enforce his point. Some concluding points The materiality of the border shows the different layers of its history. It provides an understanding of times of division but also of cross border contact and reunion. First and foremost the materiality of the border shows the interaction of people in a highly controlled environment. It also shows the struggle for control in the border landscape by the military but also by other actors connected to the border whether for single crossings or regular interaction. The remains of the military within the border have to a large degree disappeared and at a first glance they may appear nonexistent. On closer scrutiny, however, the traces can be seen and different characters appear. The most apparent information gained from the materiality of the border is about its different functions. For example, some remains are more defensive in character, such as bunkers or military stations that are built to withstand attack and supply troops. Related to these are also the remains that point to surveillance activities along the border. Here we see watchtowers, such as the one near the village of Šempeter or the long paths along the border in Nova Gorica. Perhaps most obvious is the surveillance along the ridge of Mount Sabotino/Sabotin where the double paths run along the border. One of the places where the material of the control exercised at borders is most clear and still remains is at the border crossings. Here many of the buildings, lanes and road barriers still stand, but are now abandoned. With the air of a ghost town the Casa Rossa/Rožna Dolina crossing complex is now quickly passed by traffic no longer held up by congestion caused by rigorous checks. Besides controlling the movement of people these crossings were also part of an important administrative border infrastructure where pre-EU regulations required control of goods in a stricter fashion. 114
Page 1 and 2:
An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 4 and 5:
An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 8 and 9:
Contents Acknowledgements 11 CHAPTE
Page 10:
The end of a journey 212 Sammanfatt
Page 13 and 14:
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Standing on
Page 18 and 19:
1: INTRODUCTION carried out of the
Page 20 and 21:
1: INTRODUCTION they may be… It i
Page 22 and 23:
1: INTRODUCTION where the observer
Page 24 and 25:
1: INTRODUCTION former Iron Curtain
Page 26 and 27:
1: INTRODUCTION criticism from othe
Page 28 and 29:
1: INTRODUCTION itioned somewhere i
Page 30 and 31:
1: INTRODUCTION World War II dividi
Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER 2 A physical metaphor Concr
Page 34 and 35:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR established
Page 36 and 37:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR The changing
Page 38 and 39:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR the events t
Page 40 and 41:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR As time has
Page 42 and 43:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR highly influ
Page 44:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR popular idea
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 73 and 74: Figure 16: Postcard of the newly op
Page 85 and 86: 402 Kojsko Hum 402 THE OSIM
Page 109 and 110: Figure 50: Map demonstrating the bo
Page 113: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 128 and 129: CHAPTER 5 Case Study 2 The Czech/Au
Page 130 and 131: 5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 132 and 133: Figure 55: Bunker near the crossing
Page 134 and 135: Figure 59: Military map from 1980 o
Page 160 and 161: Figure 77-78: Painting inside the f
Page 164 and 165:
5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
CHAPTER 6 An archaeology of the Iro
Page 190 and 191:
6: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTA
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Figure 102: Fence and Watch Tower a
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Sammanfattning (Summary in Swedish)
Page 218 and 219:
SAMMANFATTNING En fysisk metafor I
Page 220 and 221:
SAMMANFATTNING komst och kunskapsf
Page 222 and 223:
SAMMANFATTNING Fältstudier av läm
Page 224 and 225:
SAMMANFATTNING som försöker ta si
Page 226:
SAMMANFATTNING mets dilemma”. Han
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 242 and 243:
Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations
Page 244 and 245:
33. Sofie Bedford, Islamic activism
Page 246 and 247:
67. Anne Kaun, Civic Experiences an
Page 248 and 249:
Stockholm Studies in Archaeology Se
Page 250 and 251:
29. LINDGREN, Christina. 2004. Män
Page 252:
The Iron Curtain was seen as the di
show all

1JZGauQ

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?