1JZGauQ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN we think cannot create enough of an interesting discussion in relation to the accounts that we know we need to let them stand by themselves. Instead of taking the view of Yaneva’s ‘hasty sightseer’ discussed above, who only reproduces concepts of society and culture, we need to go with the flow and follow the connections. An archaeology of surface should not be seen as equivalent to superficiality but should instead be seen it as an opportunity to stretch our research in all directions, horizontally as well as vertically. When we follow the different tracks and paths that the sources lead us through we can make connections and find stories we were not expecting. We can see how materials and periods are intertwined in often unexpected ways and that the past that we see in the present is here for us to see as a result of a long list of influences. For the Iron Curtain these influences involve many factors such as the materiality, the narratives, the metaphors, people’s attitude in the past and today, media, popular culture and how different people interact with the material today. It is important to see all these factors in order to understand how the material was created. It is a long and at times rather random process which is constantly recreating the material and the attitudes of it. One of the consequences of following the material of the Iron Curtain is that I have been led to sights that were so much less monumental and much more mundane than what I had expected. Starting from one of the most monumental of Cold War icons and metaphors, the Iron Curtain, I found smaller sites that at first may appear rather insignificant but when you look at them, really look at them, they surprise you in the way that they connect with so much more such as different time periods, physical places, people, objects, histories, stories etc. and it becomes clear how significant these places really were during the Cold War. How these different connections extend into today varies. Those parts that do not fit are often forgotten, consciously or not. The observant reader is likely to have noticed the heavy emphasis in this thesis on the eastern side of the borders, especially in my fieldwork studies where remains in Slovenia and the Czech Republic has come to figure much more than the remains in Italy and Austria. This was not intentional but was a result of the material that I studied. It is also something which demonstrates that the physical side of the Iron Curtain, the militarised borders, were in fact here, on the eastern side, sometimes a few kilometres inside the East/West divide. This puts it in an interesting contrast to the idea of the Iron Curtain which is, as we have seen, much of a Western idea. So the friend, whom I mentioned in the beginning of this thesis, who 213
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN pointed out that the Iron Curtain never existed was in part right, at least from his western point of view. From this angle it was merely a metaphor. But had he lived in the Eastern bloc during the Cold War his view would most likely have been another and he would have claimed that the Iron Curtain was indeed a very real thing, a prison wall keeping people in rather than a protective barrier keeping the enemies out. The term may be of western origin but its presence was certainly an eastern reality. I have used my research, in particular the process of my fieldwork, in two main ways: firstly to connect to Harrison and Schofield’s call for more research of the contemporary past in order to test methods which are still seen as experimental (Harrison and Schofield 2010:88). In this work I have noticed that there is indeed great insecurity within the validity of some of the methods often used within contemporary archaeology, something that I have tried to highlight and in part address in this thesis. The research should also be seen in relation to Harrison’s ideas of archaeology as a surface in which past and present exists ‘now’ which also connects with Olivier, Olsen, Pétursdóttir and others’ discussion of the past within the present. I have also wanted to use my research to demonstrate the complex process of how the past that we see in the present can be created and recreated and how open we need to be in our approach in order to see this process, to see that the influences can be so much more extensive than what we first might think. If we carry out our research as hasty sightseers we will only reproduce those narratives which are known to us. I started at the monumental, at the metaphor of the Iron Curtain. I came across plenty of barbed wire and concrete but I found that loading this with all the symbolism of the Iron Curtain was not enough. Instead of confirming the known narratives of the Cold War with the objects that I found I followed the material and let it show me other types of connections and fragments. Finally, and possibly most importantly, I have wanted to shine a light on this amazing material that is the archaeology of the Iron Curtain, an archaeology of a metaphor. 214
Page 1 and 2:
An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 4 and 5:
An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 8 and 9:
Contents Acknowledgements 11 CHAPTE
Page 10:
The end of a journey 212 Sammanfatt
Page 13 and 14:
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Standing on
Page 18 and 19:
1: INTRODUCTION carried out of the
Page 20 and 21:
1: INTRODUCTION they may be… It i
Page 22 and 23:
1: INTRODUCTION where the observer
Page 24 and 25:
1: INTRODUCTION former Iron Curtain
Page 26 and 27:
1: INTRODUCTION criticism from othe
Page 28 and 29:
1: INTRODUCTION itioned somewhere i
Page 30 and 31:
1: INTRODUCTION World War II dividi
Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER 2 A physical metaphor Concr
Page 34 and 35:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR established
Page 36 and 37:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR The changing
Page 38 and 39:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR the events t
Page 40 and 41:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR As time has
Page 42 and 43:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR highly influ
Page 44:
2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR popular idea
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 16: Postcard of the newly op
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
402 Kojsko Hum 402 THE OSIM
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 50: Map demonstrating the bo
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 128 and 129:
CHAPTER 5 Case Study 2 The Czech/Au
Page 130 and 131:
5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 132 and 133:
Figure 55: Bunker near the crossing
Page 134 and 135:
Figure 59: Military map from 1980 o
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Figure 77-78: Painting inside the f
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165: 5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 188 and 189: CHAPTER 6 An archaeology of the Iro
Page 190 and 191: 6: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTA
Page 204 and 205: Figure 102: Fence and Watch Tower a
Page 216 and 217: Sammanfattning (Summary in Swedish)
Page 218 and 219: SAMMANFATTNING En fysisk metafor I
Page 220 and 221: SAMMANFATTNING komst och kunskapsf
Page 222 and 223: SAMMANFATTNING Fältstudier av läm
Page 224 and 225: SAMMANFATTNING som försöker ta si
Page 226: SAMMANFATTNING mets dilemma”. Han
Page 229 and 230: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 242 and 243: Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations
Page 244 and 245: 33. Sofie Bedford, Islamic activism
Page 246 and 247: 67. Anne Kaun, Civic Experiences an
Page 248 and 249: Stockholm Studies in Archaeology Se
Page 250 and 251: 29. LINDGREN, Christina. 2004. Män
Page 252: The Iron Curtain was seen as the di
show all

1JZGauQ

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?