1JZGauQ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3: THE MATERIALITY OF THE BERLIN WALL early 1990s. Therefore there are only two of the command post style buildings still in situ. These were box shaped and constructed of prefabricated concrete sections. They consisted of four levels with the command post on the second floor where large windows provided extensive views. On the first floor there was a common room with bunk beds, the ground floor housed prison cells whilst the basement held all the electronic devices required (Klausmeier and Schmidt 2004:135). The Kieler Eck command post located in the Mitte area has been given monument protection status. The tower itself therefore remain as it was when it functioned as part of the border infrastructure but its surroundings have completely changed with a new suburban area having grown up around it (Figure 6). The formerly tall-looking tower is now dwarfed by surrounding high rise blocks of flats, left as a curious feature in the otherwise residential courtyard. The second command post to remain is located at Schlesischer Busch in the area of Treptow (Figure 7). Here a large area of what used to be the border strip has been turned into a park, the tower located at its south-eastern edge. This tower is of the same type as the Kieler Eck tower, an observation and command station (Rottman 2008:27). There is none of the other type of watchtowers, BT-11 (Beobachtungtrum 11-metre), still in in situ although one is located near its original position near Potsdamer Platz (Figure 8). These more slender types of towers had much less room inside them and were used strictly for border guards to monitor the border fortifications and the control strip. 53
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN Figure 6: New residential buildings have grown up around the command post at Kieler Eck formerly located within the death strip. The tower has been given protection status and has therefore been left in its original place. Photo: Anna McWilliams. Figure 7: Command post at Schlesischer Busch. In the background is the former death strip which has been converted into a park. Photo: Anna McWilliams. 54
Page 1 and 2:
An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 4 and 5: An Archaeology of the Iron Curtain
Page 8 and 9: Contents Acknowledgements 11 CHAPTE
Page 10: The end of a journey 212 Sammanfatt
Page 13 and 14: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 16 and 17: CHAPTER 1 Introduction Standing on
Page 18 and 19: 1: INTRODUCTION carried out of the
Page 20 and 21: 1: INTRODUCTION they may be… It i
Page 22 and 23: 1: INTRODUCTION where the observer
Page 24 and 25: 1: INTRODUCTION former Iron Curtain
Page 26 and 27: 1: INTRODUCTION criticism from othe
Page 28 and 29: 1: INTRODUCTION itioned somewhere i
Page 30 and 31: 1: INTRODUCTION World War II dividi
Page 32 and 33: CHAPTER 2 A physical metaphor Concr
Page 34 and 35: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR established
Page 36 and 37: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR The changing
Page 38 and 39: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR the events t
Page 40 and 41: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR As time has
Page 42 and 43: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR highly influ
Page 44: 2: A PHYSICAL METAPHOR popular idea
Page 53: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 73 and 74: Figure 16: Postcard of the newly op
Page 85 and 86: 402 Kojsko Hum 402 THE OSIM
Page 105 and 106:
AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 50: Map demonstrating the bo
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 128 and 129:
CHAPTER 5 Case Study 2 The Czech/Au
Page 130 and 131:
5: CASE STUDY 2: THE CZECH/AUSTRIAN
Page 132 and 133:
Figure 55: Bunker near the crossing
Page 134 and 135:
Figure 59: Military map from 1980 o
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Figure 77-78: Painting inside the f
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
CHAPTER 6 An archaeology of the Iro
Page 190 and 191:
6: AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTA
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Figure 102: Fence and Watch Tower a
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Sammanfattning (Summary in Swedish)
Page 218 and 219:
SAMMANFATTNING En fysisk metafor I
Page 220 and 221:
SAMMANFATTNING komst och kunskapsf
Page 222 and 223:
SAMMANFATTNING Fältstudier av läm
Page 224 and 225:
SAMMANFATTNING som försöker ta si
Page 226:
SAMMANFATTNING mets dilemma”. Han
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 242 and 243:
Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations
Page 244 and 245:
33. Sofie Bedford, Islamic activism
Page 246 and 247:
67. Anne Kaun, Civic Experiences an
Page 248 and 249:
Stockholm Studies in Archaeology Se
Page 250 and 251:
29. LINDGREN, Christina. 2004. Män
Page 252:
The Iron Curtain was seen as the di
show all

1JZGauQ

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?