01.02.2015 Views

1JZGauQ

1JZGauQ

1JZGauQ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE IRON CURTAIN<br />

Churchill’s speech demonstrate how the matter was more complex than the<br />

then former Prime Minister was making it seem. The Times expressed<br />

concerns that portraying Western democracy and Soviet Communism as<br />

two opposing sides was unwise and that both types of governments could<br />

learn from each other (Wright 2007:46). In the days following Churchill’s<br />

speech both Prime Minister Attlee and President Truman distanced<br />

themselves from Churchill’s opinions and Stalin made it known that he<br />

took this as a ‘call to war’ (Wright 2007: 47, 56). As the Cold War advanced<br />

the use of the term Iron Curtain increased and was frequently used in<br />

speeches, papers and the media. In the West, Europe was portrayed as two<br />

polarised halves of East and West, with the Iron Curtain standing as a<br />

barrier between them keeping the captive population of the communist<br />

regimes from escaping to the west. In the German Democratic Republic<br />

(GDR) the border was referred to as the Antifaschistische Schutzwall (Anti-<br />

Fascist Protection Wall) protecting the population from the West.<br />

Following the division of Germany into sectors tension soon arose<br />

between them, in particular on the border between the zones of what was seen<br />

as the Western allies, American, British and French and the East, i.e. the<br />

Soviet controlled sectors. In her research into the development of the Inner<br />

German Border, looking specifically at how the border developed between the<br />

two towns of Sonneberg and Neustadt bei Coburg, historian Edith Sheffer<br />

(2008) demonstrates how the confusion and turmoil following World War II<br />

helped to justify the development of the border, not only the physical<br />

fortifications but also the mental border. She claims: “This mental boundary<br />

evolved surprisingly quickly and proved surprisingly powerful, not just<br />

reflecting, but itself propelling the growth of the physical border” (Sheffer<br />

2008:599). The chaos that existed in the border areas where illegal crossings, a<br />

thriving black market and violence often got out of hand, affecting life in<br />

these areas, caused many of the locals to crave stability and clear rules. This in<br />

turn was used to justify stricter regulations in the border areas, which were<br />

even welcomed. Her research of the border between the two towns of<br />

Neustadt, subsequently in Federal Republic of Germany (FDR), and<br />

Sonnenberg, in German Democratic Republic (GDR), shows that it was the<br />

Americans who first started to demarcate and fortify the border here in the<br />

late 1940s. These actions were soon followed by the Soviets erecting their own<br />

barriers, making sure they reached higher than the American 1.8 m posts, as<br />

well as adding fencing and barbed wire in some places (Sheffer 2008:91). By<br />

the time the 1,380 km fence was erected along the entire border between East<br />

and West Germany in 1952 the border had already been sufficiently<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!