06.03.2015 Views

The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers

The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers

The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

ETHICS: EXPOSITION 155<br />

l<br />

or<br />

:<br />

, disposition decrescere siimmum bonum<br />

non potest nee mrtuti ire retro licet. . . . Incrementum<br />

maxima non est ; nihil invents rectius recto (Seneca,<br />

Ep. 66).<br />

But if there are not degrees in virtue, neither are<br />

there degrees in vice : all sins are equal ;<br />

omission <strong>of</strong><br />

the most trivial duty and commission <strong>of</strong> the most glaring<br />

crime stand precisely on the same plane.<br />

2<br />

&quot;<strong>The</strong>y<br />

also<br />

maintain,&quot; says Diogenes Laertius (vii. 64, 65), &quot;that<br />

all sins are equal, as says Chrysippus in the fourth<br />

book <strong>of</strong> his Ethical Questions and Persaeus and Zeno.<br />

For if what is true is not more than true, nor what is<br />

false more than false, so also a deceit is not more than<br />

deceit, nor a sin than sin. For he who is a hundred<br />

stadia distant from Canopus and he who is only one<br />

are both equally not in Canopus ; and so also he who<br />

commits a greater and he who commits a less<br />

sin are<br />

both equally not in the right path. As a stick must<br />

be either straight or crooked, so a man must be either<br />

1<br />

Diog. Laert. vii. 89.<br />

2<br />

See Sextus Empiricus, Opera,<br />

vii.<br />

453 (422-23). Compare St.<br />

&quot;<br />

James (ii. 10) For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and : yet<br />

stumble in one point, he is become guilty <strong>of</strong> all.&quot; On the other<br />

hand, it is interesting- to observe that Calvinism, which has so<br />

much in common with the stern side <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stoic</strong>ism, viewing- sins from<br />

the standpoint <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>ology, makes distinction between them. In<br />

answer to the Question, Are all transgressions <strong>of</strong> the law <strong>of</strong> God<br />

equally heinous in themselves, and in the sight <strong>of</strong> God ? the<br />

Westminster Divines have no difficulty in replying, in <strong>The</strong> Larger<br />

Catechism, &quot;All transgressions <strong>of</strong> the law <strong>of</strong> God are not equally<br />

heinous ;<br />

but some sins in themselves, and by reason <strong>of</strong> several<br />

aggravations, are more heinous in the sight <strong>of</strong> God than others<br />

;<br />

and, immediately after, they proceed to enumerate the kinds and<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> aggravation namely, &quot;the &quot;the<br />

persons <strong>of</strong>fending,&quot;<br />

parties <strong>of</strong>fended,&quot; &quot;the nature and quality <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence,&quot; and<br />

circumstances <strong>of</strong> time and place.&quot;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!