The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers
The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers
The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
"<br />
"<br />
"<br />
"<br />
"<br />
"<br />
ETHICS: EXPOSITION 155<br />
l<br />
or<br />
:<br />
, disposition decrescere siimmum bonum<br />
non potest nee mrtuti ire retro licet. . . . Incrementum<br />
maxima non est ; nihil invents rectius recto (Seneca,<br />
Ep. 66).<br />
But if there are not degrees in virtue, neither are<br />
there degrees in vice : all sins are equal ;<br />
omission <strong>of</strong><br />
the most trivial duty and commission <strong>of</strong> the most glaring<br />
crime stand precisely on the same plane.<br />
2<br />
"<strong>The</strong>y<br />
also<br />
maintain," says Diogenes Laertius (vii. 64, 65), "that<br />
all sins are equal, as says Chrysippus in the fourth<br />
book <strong>of</strong> his Ethical Questions and Persaeus and Zeno.<br />
For if what is true is not more than true, nor what is<br />
false more than false, so also a deceit is not more than<br />
deceit, nor a sin than sin. For he who is a hundred<br />
stadia distant from Canopus and he who is only one<br />
are both equally not in Canopus ; and so also he who<br />
commits a greater and he who commits a less<br />
sin are<br />
both equally not in the right path. As a stick must<br />
be either straight or crooked, so a man must be either<br />
1<br />
Diog. Laert. vii. 89.<br />
2<br />
See Sextus Empiricus, Opera,<br />
vii.<br />
453 (422-23). Compare St.<br />
"<br />
James (ii. 10) For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and : yet<br />
stumble in one point, he is become guilty <strong>of</strong> all." On the other<br />
hand, it is interesting- to observe that Calvinism, which has so<br />
much in common with the stern side <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stoic</strong>ism, viewing- sins from<br />
the standpoint <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>ology, makes distinction between them. In<br />
answer to the Question, Are all transgressions <strong>of</strong> the law <strong>of</strong> God<br />
equally heinous in themselves, and in the sight <strong>of</strong> God ? the<br />
Westminster Divines have no difficulty in replying, in <strong>The</strong> Larger<br />
Catechism, "All transgressions <strong>of</strong> the law <strong>of</strong> God are not equally<br />
heinous ;<br />
but some sins in themselves, and by reason <strong>of</strong> several<br />
aggravations, are more heinous in the sight <strong>of</strong> God than others<br />
;<br />
and, immediately after, they proceed to enumerate the kinds and<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> aggravation namely, "the "the<br />
persons <strong>of</strong>fending,"<br />
parties <strong>of</strong>fended," "the nature and quality <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence," and<br />
circumstances <strong>of</strong> time and place."