06.03.2015 Views

The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers

The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers

The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 THE STOIC CREED<br />

they are ;<br />

etvai) <strong>of</strong> things that are, that<br />

;<br />

<strong>of</strong> things that are not, that they<br />

are not.&quot;<br />

Now, this sophistic view <strong>of</strong> the relativity <strong>of</strong> human<br />

knowledge and <strong>of</strong> human morality, this Protagorean<br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> homo mensura (/ACT/DOT/ avflpwTros), individualistically<br />

interpreted, 1 was met by Socrates met, not<br />

after the manner <strong>of</strong> the modern critic<br />

<strong>of</strong> philosophical<br />

positions, but according to his own dialectic, in the<br />

critical clash <strong>of</strong> intellect personally confronting intellect ;<br />

and the contrary doctrine, though not in so many words,<br />

was championed by him, namely, that human reason,<br />

though limited in its range, can give us truth, and that<br />

morality has a stable basis in reason and is universally<br />

valid.<br />

In this way, while agreeing with the Sophists in<br />

upholding the rights <strong>of</strong> the individual to think and to<br />

act, he separated from them wholly in his appreciation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the dignity <strong>of</strong> the individual and his ability to effect<br />

great things as participating in universal reason.<br />

If &quot;man is the measure <strong>of</strong> all things,&quot;<br />

then the<br />

logical conclusion seemed to be that truth is merely<br />

It has been argued (e.g., by Gomperz) that this individualistic<br />

1<br />

interpretation is not the correct one ; for, however it may have<br />

been in the days (say) <strong>of</strong> Aristotle or even at the end <strong>of</strong> Plato s<br />

life, neither Protagoras nor the Sophists <strong>of</strong> Socrates s time did inter<br />

pret it individualistically. In this there probably is some truth ;<br />

but<br />

the point is that the Sophists did actually degenerate, on the line<br />

<strong>of</strong> this interpretation, and that both Plato and Aristotle (the one in<br />

the <strong>The</strong>cetetus and the other in the Metaphysics) did interpret the<br />

Protagorean formula individualistically, which seems to show that<br />

relativity to the individual was at any rate implicit in the formula.<br />

It is never well to forget that Plato and Aristotle were themselves<br />

Greeks and lived near to the Socratic moment, and so were able<br />

to appreciate movements <strong>of</strong> their time and to gauge tendencies<br />

in a way that is scarcely open to modern non-Hellenic thinkers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!