06.03.2015 Views

The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers

The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers

The Stoic Creed - College of Stoic Philosophers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

46 THE STOIC CREED<br />

<strong>of</strong> the school was to sit loose to the mere linguistic<br />

clothing <strong>of</strong> thought. Substance, not form, was to them<br />

the main thing ;<br />

and it little mattered should the<br />

grammar be defective or the expression faulty, if the<br />

meaning were intelligible. Take Marcus Aurelius s<br />

writing, and you find that it is bald and unimpassioned ;<br />

and we have already seen that Rusticus, his teacher,<br />

encouraged him to that. This lack <strong>of</strong> sympathy with<br />

style, however, did not prevent Epictetus from rising<br />

occasionally to heights <strong>of</strong> real eloquence ;<br />

but that,<br />

the fire and energy <strong>of</strong> his<br />

perhaps, was owing more to<br />

nature and to the intensity <strong>of</strong> his convictions than to<br />

any conscious effort at effect. For though in his most<br />

generous mood he can admit that the man who denies<br />

that there is a faculty <strong>of</strong> expression or an art <strong>of</strong> literary<br />

form is both impious and cowardly, impious,<br />

holds in disesteem the gifts that come from God<br />

cowardly,<br />

&quot;for he<br />

&quot;for such a one seems to me to be afraid<br />

lest, if there be any faculty <strong>of</strong> this kind, we shall not<br />

be able to<br />

despise it<br />

(Diss. ii. 23), nevertheless he<br />

utters, at other times, a note <strong>of</strong> warning, lest eloquence<br />

puff up the uninstructed and feeble, and sophistry lead<br />

them astray. For by what means now could any one<br />

persuade a young man who excels in these matters that<br />

he ought not to become an appendage to them, but<br />

should make them an appendage to himself? Does he<br />

not trample all such reasons under foot, and strut before<br />

us elated and inflated, not suffering that any man should<br />

reprove him and remind him <strong>of</strong> what he has neglected<br />

and from what he has turned aside?&quot; (Diss. i. 8).<br />

Under any circumstances, rhetoric was always to be<br />

taken as a subsidiary study, useful only as subservient<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!