13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54 COVARIANT APPROACHES TO QUANTUM GRAVITY<br />

the four-momentum. After a rather long calculation, Bjerrum-Bohr et al. (2003a)<br />

find (restoring c)<br />

V (r) =− Gm (<br />

1m 2<br />

1+3 G(m 1 + m 2 )<br />

r<br />

rc 2 + 41 )<br />

G<br />

10π r 2 c 3 . (2.100)<br />

All terms are fully determined by the non-analytic parts of the one-loop amplitude;<br />

the parameters connected with the higher curvature terms in the action<br />

contribute only to the analytic parts. It is for this reason that an unambiguous<br />

result can be obtained. Note that (2.100) corresponds to an effective gravitational<br />

constant G eff (r) >G.<br />

Although arising from a one-loop amplitude, the first correction term is in fact<br />

an effect of classical GR. It can be obtained from the Einstein–Infeld–Hoffmann<br />

equations, in which none of the two bodies is treated as a test body. Interestingly,<br />

such a term had already been derived from quantum-gravitational considerations<br />

by Iwasaki (1971).<br />

The second correction is proportional to and is of genuine quantum-gravitational<br />

origin. The sign in front of this term indicates that the strength of the<br />

gravitational interaction is increased as compared to the pure Newtonian potential.<br />

21 The result (2.100) demonstrates that a definite prediction from quantum<br />

<strong>gravity</strong> is in principle possible. Unfortunately, the correction term, being of the<br />

order (l P /r) 2 ≪ 1, is not measurable in laboratory experiments: Taking for r the<br />

Bohr radius, the correction is of the order of 10 −49 . We remark that similar techniques<br />

are applied successfully in low-energy QCD (in the limit of pion masses<br />

m π → 0) and known under the term ‘chiral perturbation theory’ (which is also a<br />

‘non-renormalizable theory’ with a dimensionful coupling constant); see, for example,<br />

Gasser and Leutwyler (1984). <strong>Quantum</strong> corrections to the Schwarzschild<br />

and Kerr metrics are calculated along these lines in Bjerrum-Bohr et al. (2003b).<br />

The second example is graviton–graviton scattering. This is the simplest lowenergy<br />

process in quantum <strong>gravity</strong>. It was originally calculated in tree level by<br />

DeWitt (1967c). For the scattering of a graviton with helicity +2 with a graviton<br />

with helicity −2, for example, he found for the cross-section in the centre-of-mass<br />

frame, the expression<br />

dσ<br />

dΩ =4G2 E 2 cos12 θ/2<br />

sin 4 θ/2 , (2.101)<br />

where E is the centre-of-mass energy (and similar results for other combinations<br />

of helicity). One recognizes in the denominator of (2.101) the term well known<br />

from Rutherford scattering. DeWitt (1967c) also considered other processes such<br />

as gravitational bremsstrahlung.<br />

One-loop calculations can also be carried out. In the background-field method,<br />

the quantum fields f µν occur only in internal lines; external lines contain only<br />

the background field ḡ µν . It was already mentioned that this makes the whole<br />

21 There had been some disagreement about the exact number in (2.100); see the discussion<br />

in Bjerrum-Bohr et al. (2003a).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!