13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 COVARIANT APPROACHES TO QUANTUM GRAVITY<br />

action and the theory therefore GR. Minkowski space–time as a background<br />

structure has completely disappeared. Boulanger et al. (2001) have shown that,<br />

starting from a finite number of Fierz–Pauli Lagrangians, no consistent coupling<br />

between the various helicity-2 fields is possible if the fields occur at most with<br />

second derivatives—leading only to a sum of uncoupled Einstein–Hilbert actions.<br />

Since GR follows uniquely from (2.20), the question arises whether one would<br />

be able to construct a pure scalar, fermionic, or vector theory of <strong>gravity</strong>, cf.<br />

Feynman et al. (1995) and Straumann (2000). As has already been known to<br />

Maxwell, a vector theory is excluded because it would lead to repulsing forces.<br />

Fermions are excluded because the object that emits a fermion does not remain<br />

in the same internal state (there are also problems with a two-fermion exchange).<br />

A scalar theory, on the other hand, would only lead to attraction. In fact, even<br />

before the advent of GR, Nordström had tried to describe <strong>gravity</strong> by a scalar<br />

theory, which can be defined by the Lagrangian<br />

L = − 1 2 ηµν ∂ µ φ∂ ν φ − 4πGTφ + L matter , (2.27)<br />

where T = η µν T µν . This leads to the field equation<br />

✷φ =4πGT . (2.28)<br />

The physical metric (as measured by rods and clocks) turns out to be<br />

g µν (x) ≡ φ 2 (x)η µν .<br />

It is thus conformally flat and possesses a vanishing Weyl tensor. A non-linear<br />

generalization of the Nordström theory was given by Einstein and Fokker (1914);<br />

their field equations read<br />

R =24πGT . (2.29)<br />

However, this theory is in contradiction with observation, since it does not implement<br />

an interaction between <strong>gravity</strong> and the electromagnetic field (the latter<br />

has T = 0) and the perihelion motion of Mercury comes out incorrectly. Moreover,<br />

this theory contains an absolute structure; cf. Section 1.3: the conformal<br />

structure (the ‘lightcone’) is given from the outset and the theory thus possesses<br />

an invariance group (the conformal group), which in four dimensions is a finitedimensional<br />

Lie group and which must be conceptually distinguished from the<br />

diffeomorphism group of GR. While pure scalar fields are thus unsuitable for<br />

a theory of the gravitational field, they can nevertheless occur in addition to<br />

the metric of GR. In fact, this happens quite frequently in unified theories; cf.<br />

Chapter 9.<br />

2.1.2 Gravitons from representations of the Poincaré group<br />

We shall now turn to the quantum theory of the linear gravitational field. The<br />

discussion of the previous subsection suggests that it is described by the behaviour<br />

of a massless spin-2 particle. Why massless? From the long-range nature

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!