13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

206 QUANTIZATION OF BLACK HOLES<br />

The temperature (7.11) refers to an observer at infinite distance from the hole.<br />

For finite distance one has to modify this expression by a redshift factor. If the<br />

observer is static, he is in a state of acceleration, and therefore the temperature<br />

contains both the Hawking and the Unruh effect. Close to the horizon, only<br />

the Unruh effect remains, and a freely falling observer does not experience any<br />

temperature at all.<br />

For the total luminosity of the black hole, one finds in the Schwarzschild case,<br />

L = − dM dt<br />

= 1<br />

2π<br />

∞∑<br />

(2l +1)<br />

l=0<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

Γ ωl<br />

dωω<br />

e 2πκ−1 ω<br />

− 1 . (7.12)<br />

To obtain the expression for the Kerr–Newman black hole, one has to replace<br />

2πκ −1 ω with 2πκ −1 (ω −mΩ H −qΦ), where m is the azimuthal quantum number<br />

of the spherical harmonics. The spectrum thus involves a chemical potential. The<br />

term Γ ωl —called ‘greybody factor’ because it encodes a deviation from the blackbody<br />

spectrum—takes into account the fact that some of the particle modes are<br />

back-scattered into the black hole by means of space–time curvature.<br />

For the special case of the Schwarzschild metric, where κ =(4GM) −1 , (7.11)<br />

becomes the expression (1.33). One can estimate the life-time of such a black<br />

hole by making the plausible assumption that the decrease in mass is equal to<br />

the energy radiated to infinity. This corresponds to a heuristic implementation<br />

of the back reaction of Hawking radiation on the black hole. (Without this back<br />

reaction, energy would not be conserved.) Using Stefan–Boltzmann’s law, one<br />

gets<br />

dM<br />

dt<br />

which when integrated yields<br />

( ) 4 1<br />

∝−ATBH 4 ∝−M 2 × = − 1<br />

M M 2 ,<br />

t(M) ∝ (M 3 0 − M 3 ) ≈ M 3 0 . (7.13)<br />

Here M 0 is the initial mass. It has been assumed that after the evaporation<br />

M ≪ M 0 . Very roughly, the life-time of a black hole is thus given by<br />

( ) 3 ( ) 3 M0<br />

τ BH ≈ t P ≈ 10 65 M0<br />

years . (7.14)<br />

m P M ⊙<br />

Hawking used the semiclassical approximation in which the non-gravitational<br />

fields are quantum but the gravitational field is treated as an external classical<br />

field; cf. Section 5.4. This approximation is expected to break down when the<br />

black-hole mass approaches the Planck mass, that is, after a time given by (7.14).<br />

Only a full theory of quantum <strong>gravity</strong> can describe the final stage of black-hole<br />

evaporation. This would then necessarily include the full back-reaction effect of<br />

the Hawking radiation on the black hole.<br />

The original derivation of the Hawking effect deals with non-local ‘particle’<br />

modes (Hawking 1975). Alternatively, one can base the analysis solely on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!