13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUANTUM-GRAVITATIONAL ASPECTS 305<br />

´Ýµ<br />

Ý ¼<br />

Ý <br />

¦· ¦<br />

Fig. 9.2. The situation in the Randall–Sundrum model with two branes. The<br />

warp factor is a(y) =exp(−|y|/l).<br />

This could provide a solution to the hierarchy problem in this model; see Randall<br />

and Sundrum (1999). With the fine tuning (9.81) this solution exists for an<br />

arbitrary brane separation d—the two flat branes stay in equilibrium. Their<br />

flatness is the result of a compensation between the bulk cosmological constant<br />

and the brane tensions. We note that the distance between the branes need not<br />

be big, unlike the ADD scenario. This is because of the exponential decrease of<br />

the gravitational ‘force’ between the branes.<br />

More generally one considers the Randall–Sundrum model with small matter<br />

sources for metric perturbations h AB (x, y) on the background of this solution,<br />

ds 2 =dy 2 +e −2|y|/l η µν dx µ dx ν + h AB (x, y)dx A dx B , (9.83)<br />

such that this five-dimensional metric induces on the branes two four-dimensional<br />

metrics of the form<br />

g ± µν(x) =a 2 ± η µν + h ± µν(x) . (9.84)<br />

Here the scale factors a ± = a(y ± ) can be expressed in terms of the interbrane<br />

distance,<br />

a + =1, a − =e −2d/l ≡ a, (9.85)<br />

and h ± µν (x) are the perturbations by which the brane metrics g± µν (x) differfrom<br />

the (conformally) flat metric in the Randall–Sundrum solution (9.82).<br />

Instead of using the Kaluza–Klein formalism with its infinite tower of modes,<br />

one can employ an alternative formalism which captures more the spirit of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!