13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

308 INTERPRETATION<br />

10.1.1 Decoherence in quantum mechanics<br />

If quantum theory is universally valid, every system should be described in quantum<br />

terms, and it would be inconsistent to draw an aprioriborder line between<br />

a quantum system and a classical apparatus. John von Neumann was the first<br />

who analysed in 1932 the measurement process within quantum mechanics; see<br />

von Neumann (1932). He considers the coupling of a system (S) to an apparatus<br />

(A), see Fig. 10.1.<br />

S<br />

✲<br />

A<br />

Fig. 10.1. Original form of the von Neumann measurement model.<br />

If the states of the measured system that are discriminated by the apparatus<br />

are denoted by |n〉 (e.g. spin up and spin down), an appropriate interaction<br />

Hamiltonian has the form<br />

H int = ∑ n<br />

|n〉〈n|⊗Ân . (10.1)<br />

The operators Ân act on the states of the apparatus and are rather arbitrary, but<br />

must, of course, depend on the ‘quantum number’ n. Equation (10.1) describes<br />

an ‘ideal’ interaction during which the apparatus becomes correlated with the<br />

system state, without changing the latter. There is thus no disturbance of the<br />

system by the apparatus—on the contrary, the apparatus is disturbed by the<br />

system (in order to yield a measurement result).<br />

If the measured system is initially in the state |n〉 and the device in some<br />

initial state |Φ 0 〉, the evolution according to the Schrödinger equation with the<br />

Hamiltonian (10.1) reads<br />

( )<br />

t<br />

|n〉|Φ 0 〉 −→ exp (−iH int t) |n〉|Φ 0 〉 = |n〉 exp −iÂnt |Φ 0 〉<br />

≡|n〉|Φ n (t)〉 . (10.2)<br />

The resulting apparatus states |Φ n (t)〉 are often called ‘pointer states’. A process<br />

analogous to (10.2) can also be formulated in classical physics. The essential<br />

new quantum features now come into play when one considers a superposition<br />

of different eigenstates (of the measured ‘observable’) as the initial state. The<br />

linearity of time evolution immediately leads to<br />

( ) ∑<br />

t<br />

c n |n〉 |Φ 0 〉 −→ ∑ c n |n〉|Φ n (t)〉 . (10.3)<br />

n<br />

n<br />

But this state is a superposition of macroscopic measurement results (of which<br />

Schrödinger’s cat is just one drastic example)! To avoid such a bizarre state,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!