13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

268 QUANTUM COSMOLOGY<br />

from the no-boundary proposal:<br />

df n<br />

f n (0) = 0 , n =2, 3,... , (0) = 0 , n =1.<br />

dτ<br />

This then yields for the wave functions ψ n satisfying the Schrödinger equations<br />

(8.49) a solution that just corresponds to the Euclidean vacuum. The reason is<br />

that essentially the same regularity conditions are required for the no-boundary<br />

proposal and the Euclidean vacuum. In the Lorentzian section, the Euclidean<br />

vacuum for modes with small wavelength (satisfying λ ≪ H −1 )isjustgivenby<br />

the state (8.56); see also Section 10.1. According to the no-boundary proposal,<br />

the multipoles thus enter the Lorentzian regime in their ground state. Because<br />

of its high symmetry, the de Sitter-invariant vacuum was assumed to be a natural<br />

initial quantum state even before the advent of the no-boundary condition<br />

(Starobinsky 1979).<br />

Hawking (1984) has put forward the point of view that the Euclidean path<br />

integral is the true fundamental concept. The fact that a Euclidean metric usually<br />

does not have a Lorentzian section, therefore, does not matter. Only the result—<br />

the wave function—counts. If the wave function turns out to be exponentially<br />

increasing or decreasing, it describes a classically forbidden region. If it is of<br />

oscillatory form, it describes a classically allowed region—this corresponds to the<br />

world we live in. Since one has to use in general complex integration contours<br />

anyway, it is clear that only the result can have interpretational value, with the<br />

formal manipulations playing only the role of a heuristic device.<br />

8.3.3 Tunnelling condition<br />

The no-boundary wave function calculated in the last subsection turned out to be<br />

real. This is a consequence of the Euclidean path integral; even if complex metrics<br />

contribute they should do so in complex-conjugate pairs. The wave function<br />

(8.63) can be written as a sum of semiclassical components of the form exp(iS),<br />

each of which gives rise to a semiclassical world in the sense of Section 5.4<br />

(recovery of the Schrödinger equation). These components become independent<br />

of each other only after decoherence is taken into account; see Section 10.1.<br />

Alternative boundary conditions may directly give a complex wave function,<br />

being of the form exp(iS) in the semiclassical approximation. This is achieved<br />

by the ‘tunnelling proposal’ put forward by Vilenkin; see, for example, Vilenkin<br />

(1988, 2003). 5<br />

The tunnelling proposal is most easily being formulated in minisuperspace.<br />

In analogy with, for example, the process of α-decay in quantum mechanics, it is<br />

proposed that the wave function consists solely of outgoing modes. More generally,<br />

it states that it consists solely of outgoing modes at singular boundaries of<br />

superspace (except the boundaries corresponding to vanishing three-geometry).<br />

In the minisuperspace example above, this is the region of infinite a or φ. What<br />

5 Like the no-boundary proposal, this usually refers to closed three-space Σ. A treatment of<br />

‘tunnelling’ into a universe with open Σ is presented in Zel’dovich and Starobinsky (1984).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!