13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SEMICLASSICAL APPROXIMATION 167<br />

Various approximations can now be performed. In a first step, one can assume<br />

that the ‘heavy’ part is approximately insensitive to changes in the ‘light’ part.<br />

This enables one to neglect the off-diagonal parts in (5.129), leading to<br />

[ ( ) 2<br />

1 ∂<br />

2M i ∂Q − A nn(Q) + V (Q)+E n (Q)]<br />

χ n (Q) =Eχ n (Q) , (5.131)<br />

where E n (Q) ≡ ɛ nn (Q). For real ψ n , the connection vanishes, A nn =0.Otherwise,<br />

it leads to a geometric phase (‘Berry phase’); cf. Berry (1984). We shall<br />

neglect the connection in the following. 19<br />

In a second step, one can perform a standard semiclassical (WKB) approximation<br />

for the heavy part through the ansatz<br />

χ n (Q) =C n (Q)e iMSn(Q)/ . (5.132)<br />

This is inserted into (5.131). For the Q-derivative, one gets<br />

∂ 2 χ n<br />

∂Q 2<br />

χ n<br />

= ∂2 C n<br />

∂Q 2 + 2iM C n <br />

( M<br />

−<br />

<br />

∂C n<br />

∂Q<br />

∂S n<br />

∂Q<br />

) 2 ( ∂Sn<br />

∂Q<br />

) 2<br />

χ n + iM <br />

χ n<br />

C n<br />

∂ 2 S n<br />

∂Q 2 χ n . (5.133)<br />

Assuming M to be large corresponds to neglecting derivatives of C n and second<br />

derivatives of S n (the usual assumptions for WKB). One then has<br />

∂ 2 χ n<br />

∂Q 2<br />

≈− ( M<br />

<br />

) 2 ( ) 2 ∂Sn<br />

χ n . (5.134)<br />

∂Q<br />

The classical momentum is then given by<br />

P n = M ∂S n<br />

∂Q ≈<br />

and (5.131) becomes the Hamilton–Jacobi equation,<br />

<br />

iχ n<br />

∂χ n<br />

∂Q , (5.135)<br />

H cl ≡ P 2 n<br />

2M + V (Q)+E n(Q) =E. (5.136)<br />

Since E n (Q) =〈ψ n |h|ψ n 〉, this corresponds, in the gravitational context, to the<br />

semiclassical Einstein equations discussedinSection1.2,wheretheexpectation<br />

value of the energy–momentum tensor appears.<br />

19 An intriguing idea would be to derive the connection in gauge theories along these lines.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!