13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CANONICAL QUANTIZATION OF THE SCHWARZSCHILD BLACK HOLE 213<br />

7.2.2 Quantization<br />

Quantization then proceeds in the way discussed in Chapter 5 by acting with an<br />

operator version of the constraints on wave functionals Ψ[R(r); τ,λ). Since (7.32)<br />

leads to δΨ/δR = 0, one is left with a purely quantum mechanical wave function<br />

ψ(τ,λ). One could call this a ‘quantum Birkhoff theorem’. The implementation<br />

of the constraints (7.34) and (7.35) then yields<br />

which can be readily solved to give<br />

∂ψ<br />

+ Mψ =0,<br />

i ∂τ<br />

(7.38)<br />

∂ψ<br />

+ qψ =0,<br />

i ∂λ<br />

(7.39)<br />

ψ(τ,λ) =χ(M,q)e −i(Mτ+qλ)/ (7.40)<br />

with an arbitrary function χ(M,q). Note that M and q are considered here as<br />

being fixed. The reason for this is that up to now we have restricted attention to<br />

one semiclassical component of the wave function only (eigenstates of mass and<br />

charge).<br />

If the hypersurface goes through the whole Kruskal diagram of the eternal<br />

hole, only the boundary term at r →∞(and an analogous one for r →−∞)<br />

contributes. Of particular interest in the black-hole case, however, is the case<br />

where the surface originates at the ‘bifurcation surface’ (r → 0) of past and<br />

future horizons. This makes sense since data on such a surface suffice to construct<br />

the whole right Kruskal wedge, which is all that is accessible to an observer in<br />

this region. Moreover, this mimicks the situation where a black hole is formed<br />

by collapse, in which the regions III and IV of the Kruskal diagram are absent.<br />

What are the boundary conditions to be adopted at r → 0? They are chosen<br />

in such a way that the classical solutions have a non-degenerate horizon and<br />

that the hypersurfaces start at r = 0 asymptotically to hypersurfaces of constant<br />

Killing time (Louko and Whiting 1995). In particular,<br />

N(r, t) =N 1 (t)r + O(r 3 ) , (7.41)<br />

L(r, t) =L 0 (t)+O(r 2 ) , (7.42)<br />

R(r, t) =R 0 (t)+R 2 (t)r 2 + O(r 4 ) . (7.43)<br />

Variation leads, similarly to the situation at r →∞, to a boundary term at<br />

r =0,<br />

−N 1 R 0 (GL 0 ) −1 δR 0 .<br />

If N 1 ≠ 0, this term must be subtracted (N 1 = 0 corresponds to the case of<br />

extremal holes, |q| = √ GM, which is characterized by ∂N/∂r(r =0)=0).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!