13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

94 PARAMETRIZED AND RELATIONAL SYSTEMS<br />

because the two sets of relative separations give no information about the angular<br />

momentum or kinetic energy of the system, both of which affect the future<br />

evolution.<br />

This ‘Poincaré defect’ (because Poincaré pronounced this lack of predictability)<br />

motivated Barbour and Bertotti (1982) to look for a slight generalization of<br />

Newtonian mechanics in which the future can be predicted solely on the basis<br />

of relative separations (and their rates of change). The key idea is to introduce<br />

a ‘gauge freedom’ with respect to translations and rotations (because these<br />

transformations leave the relative distances invariant) and the choice of the time<br />

parameter τ. The theory should thus be invariant under the following gauge<br />

transformations,<br />

x k ↦→ x ′ k = x k + a(τ)+α(τ) × x k , (3.100)<br />

where a parametrizes translations, α rotations, and x k is the position vector<br />

of particle k. They depend on the ‘label time’ τ which can be arbitrarily<br />

reparametrized,<br />

τ ↦→ f(τ) , f>0 ˙ . (3.101)<br />

Due to (3.100) one has instead of the original 3n only 3n − 6 parameters to<br />

describe the relative distances. Equations (3.100) and (3.101) define the ‘Leibniz<br />

group’ (Barbour and Bertotti 1982; Barbour 1986). One can now define a total<br />

velocity for each particle according to<br />

Dx k<br />

Dτ<br />

≡ ∂x k<br />

∂τ + ȧ(τ)+ ˙α(τ) × x k , (3.102)<br />

in which the first term on the right-hand side denotes the rate of change in<br />

some chosen frame, and the second and third terms the rate of change due to a<br />

τ-dependent change of frame. This velocity is not yet gauge invariant. A gaugeinvariant<br />

quantity can be constructed by minimizing the ‘kinetic energy’<br />

n∑<br />

k=1<br />

Dx k<br />

Dτ<br />

Dx k<br />

Dτ<br />

with respect to a and α. This procedure is also called ‘horizontal stacking’ (Barbour<br />

1986). Intuitively it can be understood as putting two slides with the particle<br />

positions marked on them on top of each other and moving them relative to<br />

each other until the centres of mass coincide and there is no overall rotation. The<br />

result of the horizontal stacking is a gauge-invariant ‘intrinsic velocity’, dx/dτ.<br />

Having these velocities for each particle at one’s disposal one can construct the<br />

kinetic term<br />

T = 1 n∑<br />

( ) 2 dxk<br />

m k . (3.103)<br />

2 dτ<br />

k=1<br />

The potential is the standard Newtonian potential<br />

V = −G ∑ k

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!