13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUANTUM-GRAVITATIONAL ASPECTS 303<br />

the Planck scale m P ≈ 10 19 GeV. This works as follows. 5 One starts with the<br />

Einstein–Hilbert action in D =4+d dimensions,<br />

∫<br />

1<br />

S EH = d 4 xd d y √ −g (D) D R, (9.77)<br />

16πG D<br />

where the index D refers to the corresponding quantities in D dimensions. We<br />

denote by m ∗ the D-dimensional Planck mass, that is,<br />

G D = 1<br />

m D−2<br />

∗<br />

= 1<br />

m d+2<br />

∗<br />

where d = D − 4 is the number of extra dimensions. Assuming that the D-<br />

dimensional metric is (approximately) independent of the extra dimensions labelled<br />

by y, one gets from (9.77) an effectively four-dimensional action,<br />

S EH =<br />

V ∫<br />

d<br />

d 4 x √ −g (4) 4 R, (9.78)<br />

16πG D<br />

where V d ∼ R d denotes the volume of the extra dimensions. Comparison with<br />

the four-dimensional Einstein–Hilbert action (1.1) gives the connection between<br />

m ∗ and the four-dimensional Planck mass,<br />

,<br />

m P ∼ m ∗ (m ∗ R) d/2 . (9.79)<br />

The four-dimensional Planck mass is thus big (compared to the weak scale) because<br />

the size of the extra dimensions is big. Thereby the hierarchy problem<br />

is transferred to a different problem: why is R so big? This reformulation has<br />

two advantages. First, a unified theory such as string theory might give an explanation<br />

for the size of R. Second, it opens the possibility of observing the<br />

extra dimensions, either through scattering experiments at colliders or through<br />

sub-mm tests of Newton’s law; see Rubakov (2001) and the references therein.<br />

Higher-dimensional theories generically predict a violation of the Newtonian 1/rpotential<br />

at some scale. No sign of the extra dimensions, however, has been seen<br />

up to now.<br />

Both in the traditional Kaluza–Klein and the ADD scenario, the full metric<br />

factorizes 6 into the four-dimensional part describing our macroscopic dimensions<br />

and the (compact) part referring to the extra dimensions. Such an assumption is,<br />

however, not obligatory. If factorization does not hold, one talks about a ‘warped<br />

metric’. The extra dimensions can be compact or infinite in size. A warped metric<br />

occurs, for example, if the gravitational field produced by the brane is taken into<br />

5 It was also suggested that this huge discrepancy in scales may have a cosmological origin;<br />

cf. Hogan (2000).<br />

6 Factorization here means that the D-dimensional metric can be put into block-diagonal<br />

form, in which one block is the four-dimensional metric, and where the various blocks do not<br />

depend on the coordinates referring to the other blocks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!