13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE FREE BOSONIC STRING 83<br />

and<br />

Ĥ 1 Ψ[X µ (σ)] ≡ δΨ<br />

i Xµ′ =0, (3.49)<br />

δX<br />

µ<br />

where the factor ordering has been chosen such that the momenta are on the<br />

right. Note that in contrast to the examples in Section 3.1, one has now to deal<br />

with functional derivatives, defined by the Taylor expansion<br />

∫<br />

Ψ[φ(σ)+η(σ)] = Ψ[φ(σ)] + dσ<br />

δΨ η(σ)+··· . (3.50)<br />

δφ(σ)<br />

The above implementation of the constraints is only possible if there are no<br />

anomalies; see the end of this section and Section 5.3.5. An important property<br />

of the quantized string is that such anomalies in fact occur, preventing the validity<br />

of all quantum equations (3.48) and (3.49). Equations such as (3.48) and (3.49)<br />

will occur at several places later and will be further discussed there, for example<br />

in the context of parametrized field theories (Section 3.3).<br />

Note that this level of quantization corresponds to a ‘first-quantized string’ in<br />

analogy to first quantization of point particles (Section 3.1). The usual ‘second<br />

quantization’ would mean to elevate the wave functions Ψ[X µ (σ)] themselves<br />

into operators (‘string field theory’). It must also be emphasized that ‘first’ and<br />

‘second’ are at best heuristic notions since there is just one quantum theory (cf.<br />

in this context Zeh (2003)).<br />

In the following, we shall briefly discuss the connection with the standard<br />

textbook treatment of the bosonic string; see, for example, Polchinski (1998a).<br />

This will also be a useful preparation for the discussion of string theory in Chapter<br />

9. Usually one starts with the Polyakov action for the bosonic string,<br />

S P = − 1<br />

4πα<br />

∫M<br />

′ d 2 σ √ hh αβ (σ, τ)∂ α X µ ∂ β X µ , (3.51)<br />

where h αβ denotes the intrinsic (not induced) metric on the worldsheet, and<br />

h ≡|deth αβ |. In contrast to the induced metric, it consists of independent degrees<br />

of freedom with respect to which the action can be varied. The action (3.51)<br />

can be interpreted as describing ‘two-dimensional <strong>gravity</strong> coupled to D massless<br />

scalar fields’. Since the Einstein–Hilbert action is a topological invariant in two<br />

dimensions, there is no pure <strong>gravity</strong> term present, and only the coupling of the<br />

metric to the X µ remains in (3.51). One can also take into account a cosmological<br />

term, see Chapter 9. In contrast to (3.37), the Polyakov action is much easier to<br />

handle, especially when used in a path integral.<br />

The Polyakov action has many invariances. First, it is invariant with respect<br />

to diffeomorphisms on the worldsheet. Second, and most importantly, it possesses<br />

Weyl invariance, that is, an invariance under the transformations<br />

h αβ (σ, τ) ↦→ e 2ω(σ,τ ) h αβ (σ, τ) (3.52)<br />

with an arbitrary function ω(σ, τ). This is a special feature of two dimensions<br />

where √ hh αβ ↦→ √ hh αβ . It means that distances on the worldsheet have no

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!