13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

272 QUANTUM COSMOLOGY<br />

8.3.5 Symmetric initial condition<br />

This condition has been proposed by Conradi and Zeh (1991); see also Conradi<br />

(1992). For the wave-packet solutions of Section 8.1, we had to demand that ψ<br />

goes to zero for α →∞. Otherwise, the packet would not reflect the behaviour<br />

of a classically recollapsing universe. But what about the behaviour at α →−∞<br />

(a → 0)? Consider again the model of a massive scalar field in a Friedmann universe<br />

given by the Wheeler–DeWitt equation (8.25). The potential term vanishes<br />

in the limit α →−∞, so the solutions which are exponentially decreasing for<br />

large α become constant in this limit. With regard to finding normalizable solutions,<br />

it would be ideal if there were a reflecting potential also at α →−∞.One<br />

can add for this purpose in an ad hoc manner a repulsive (negative) potential<br />

that would be of relevance only in the Planck regime. The application of loop<br />

quantum <strong>gravity</strong> to cosmology as discussed in the next section can lead to the<br />

occurrence of such a respulsive potential. It is also imaginable that it results from<br />

a unification of interactions. One can, for example, choose the ‘Planck potential’<br />

V P (α) =−C 2 e −2α , (8.78)<br />

where C is a real constant. Neglecting as in the previous subsections the φ-<br />

derivatives (corresponding to the slow-roll approximation), one can thereby select<br />

a solution to the Wheeler–DeWitt equation ((8.25) supplemented by V P )<br />

that decreases exponentially towards α →−∞. This implements also DeWitt’s<br />

boundary condition that ψ → 0forα →−∞(Section 8.3.1).<br />

The ‘symmetric initial condition’ (SIC) now states that the full wave function<br />

depends for α →−∞only on α; cf. Conradi and Zeh (1991). In other words,<br />

it is a particular superposition (not an ensemble) of all excited states of Φ and<br />

the three-metric, that is, these degrees of freedom are completely absent in the<br />

wave function. This is analogous to the symmetric vacuum state in field theory<br />

before the symmetry breaking into the ‘false’ vacuum (Zeh 2001). In both cases,<br />

the actual symmetry breaking will occur through decoherence (Section 10.1).<br />

The resulting wave function coincides approximately with the no-boundary wave<br />

function. Like there, the higher multipoles enter the semiclassical Friedmann<br />

regime in their ground state. The SIC is also well suited for a discussion of the<br />

arrow of time and the dynamical origin of irreversibility; cf. Section 10.2.<br />

8.4 Loop quantum cosmology<br />

8.4.1 Classical variables<br />

The cosmological applications of quantum <strong>gravity</strong> discussed above mainly make<br />

use of the geometrodynamical variables. However, quantum cosmology can also<br />

be treated using the loop variables discussed in Chapter 6. The ensuing framework<br />

of loop quantum cosmology was introduced by Martin Bojowald; see Bojowald<br />

(2005) for a detailed review and references. The mathematical structure<br />

of loop quantum cosmology is presented in Ashtekar et al. (2003). Similarly<br />

to the minisuperspace approach discussed above, loop quantum cosmology is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!