13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

164 QUANTUM GEOMETRODYNAMICS<br />

H AA ′Ψ = 0 must hold automatically. This could lead to considerable simplification<br />

because (5.115)–(5.118) involve at most first-order derivatives.<br />

Canonical quantum SUGRA can be applied, for example, in the context of<br />

quantum cosmology (Section 8.1). One can also study some general properties.<br />

One of them is the fact that pure bosonic states cannot exist (see e.g. Moniz 1996<br />

for discussion and references). This can easily be shown. Considering a bosonic<br />

state Ψ[e AA′<br />

a ], one has δΨ/δψ A a<br />

= 0 and recognizes immediately that (5.118) is<br />

solved, that is, S A Ψ = 0. Assuming that Ψ[e AA′<br />

a ] is Lorentz invariant, that is,<br />

that the Lorentz constraints are already fulfilled, it is clear that a state with<br />

¯S A′ Ψ = 0 satisfies all constraints. However, such a state cannot exist. This can<br />

be seen as follows (Carroll et al. 1994). One multiplies ¯S A′ Ψ=0by[Ψ] −1 and<br />

integrates over space with an arbitrary spinorial test function ¯ɛ A′ (x) toget<br />

∫<br />

(<br />

I ≡ d 3 x ¯ɛ A′ (x) ɛ abc e AA′ a s D b ψc<br />

A<br />

+4πGψ A a<br />

δ(ln Ψ)<br />

δe AA′ a<br />

)<br />

=0. (5.119)<br />

This must hold for all fields and all ¯ɛ A′ (x). If one now replaces ¯ɛ A′ (x) by<br />

¯ɛ A′ (x)exp(−φ(x)) and ψa A(x) byψA a (x)exp(φ(x)), where φ(x) is some arbitrary<br />

function, the second term in (5.119) cancels out in the difference ∆I between<br />

the old and the new integral, and one is left with<br />

∫<br />

∆I = − d 3 xɛ abc e AA′ a¯ɛ A′ ψc A ∂ bφ =0, (5.120)<br />

which is independent of the state Ψ. It is obvious that one can choose the fields as<br />

well as ¯ɛ A′ (x) andφ(x) in such a way that the integral is non-vanishing, leading<br />

to a contradiction. Therefore, no physical bosonic states can exist, and a solution<br />

of the quantum constraints can be represented in the form<br />

Ψ[e AA′<br />

a<br />

(x),ψ A a (x)] = ∞ ∑<br />

n=1<br />

Ψ (n) [e AA′<br />

a (x),ψa A (x)] , (5.121)<br />

where the expansion is into states with fermion number n. In fact, one can<br />

show with similar arguments that any solution of the quantum constraints must<br />

have infinite fermion number. An explicit solution of a peculiar type was found<br />

(without any regularization) by Csordás and Graham (1995).<br />

5.4 The semiclassical approximation<br />

5.4.1 Analogies from quantum mechanics<br />

The semiclassical approximation to quantum geometrodynamics discussed here<br />

uses, in fact, a mixture of two different approximation schemes. The full system<br />

is divided into two parts with very different scales. One part is called the<br />

‘heavy part’—for it the standard semiclassical (WKB) approximation is used.<br />

The other part is called the ‘light part’—it is treated fully quantum and follows<br />

adiabatically the dynamics of the heavy part. A mixed scheme of this kind is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!