13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

QUANTUM-GRAVITATIONAL ASPECTS 285<br />

matically contained in string theory. Here we discuss other aspects which are<br />

relevant in the context of quantum <strong>gravity</strong>.<br />

One can generalize the Polyakov action (3.51) to the situation of a string<br />

moving in a general D-dimensional curved space–time. It makes sense to take<br />

into account besides <strong>gravity</strong> other massless fields that arise in string excitations—<br />

the dilaton and the ‘axion’. One therefore formulates the generalized Polyakov<br />

action as<br />

S P ≡ S σ + S φ + S B<br />

= − 1 ∫ (√<br />

4πα ′ d 2 σ hh αβ ∂ α X µ ∂ β X ν g µν (X)<br />

−α ′√ )<br />

h (2) RΦ(X)+ɛ αβ ∂ α X µ ∂ β X ν B µν (X)<br />

. (9.26)<br />

The fields g µν (D-dimensional metric of the embedding space), Φ (dilaton), and<br />

B µν (antisymmetric tensor field) are background fields, that is, they will not be<br />

integrated over in the path integral. The fields X µ define again the embedding of<br />

the worldsheet into the D-dimensional space which is also called ‘target space’.<br />

An action in which the coefficients of the kinetic term depend on the fields themselves<br />

(here, g µν depends on X) is for historic reasons called a non-linear sigma<br />

model. This is why the first part on the right-hand side of (9.26) is abbreviated<br />

as S σ . The second part S φ is, in fact, independent of the string parameter α ′ ,<br />

since in natural units (where = 1), the dilaton is dimensionless. We emphasize<br />

that (9.26) describes a quantum field theory on the worldsheet, not the target<br />

space. For the latter, one uses an effective action (see below).<br />

In string theory, it has been proven fruitful to employ a path-integral approach<br />

in which the worldsheet is taken to be Euclidean instead of Minkowskian;<br />

cf. Section 2.2. This has the advantage that the integral over the metric is better<br />

defined. Polchinski (1998a, p. 82) presents a formal argument why the resulting<br />

theory is equivalent to the original Minkowskian version.<br />

In the Euclidean formulation, where σ 1 = σ and σ 2 =iτ, the starting point<br />

would thus be<br />

∫<br />

Z = DXDh e −SP , (9.27)<br />

where X and h are a shorthand for the embedding variables and the worldsheet<br />

metric, respectively. Only these variables are to be integrated over. In order to<br />

get a sensible expression, one must employ the gauge-fixing procedure outlined<br />

in Section 2.2.3. The invariances on the worldsheet involve two local diffeomorphisms<br />

and one Weyl transformation. Since h ab (σ 1 ,σ 2 ) has three independent<br />

parameters, one can fix it to a given ‘fiducial’ form ˜h ab , for example, ˜h ab = δ ab<br />

(‘flat gauge’) or ˜h ab =exp[2ω(σ 1 ,σ 2 )]δ ab (‘conformal gauge’). As discussed in<br />

Section 2.2.3, the Faddeev–Popov determinant can be written as a path integral<br />

over (anticommuting) ghost fields. The action in (9.27) has then to be replaced<br />

by the full action S P + S ghost + S gf , that is, augmented by ghost and gauge-fixing<br />

action.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!