13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158 QUANTUM GEOMETRODYNAMICS<br />

where D ab is the covariant derivative with respect to the DeWitt metric,<br />

D ab ≡ DΨ .<br />

Dh ab<br />

The big open problem is of course to see whether this result survives the transition<br />

to the field-theoretic case, that is, whether no anomalies are present after a<br />

consistent regularization has been performed.<br />

5.3.6 Canonical quantum super<strong>gravity</strong><br />

We have seen in Section 2.3 that the quantization of super<strong>gravity</strong> instead of GR<br />

exhibits interesting features. Thus, it seems worthwhile to discuss the canonical<br />

quantization of super<strong>gravity</strong> (SUGRA). This will be briefly reviewed here; more<br />

details can be found in D’Eath (1984, 1996) and Moniz (1996). The situation in<br />

three space–time dimensions is addressed in Nicolai and Matschull (1993). Here,<br />

we will only consider the case of N = 1 SUGRA given by the action (2.142).<br />

The classical canonical formalism was developed by Fradkin and Vasiliev<br />

(1977), Pilati (1977), and Teitelboim (1977). Working again with tetrads (cf.<br />

Section 1.1), one has<br />

g µν = η nm e n µ em ν . (5.73)<br />

For the quantization it is more convenient to use two-component spinors according<br />

to<br />

e AA′<br />

µ = e n µσn AA′ , (5.74)<br />

where A runs from 1 to 2, A ′ from 1 ′ to 2 ′ , and the van der Waerden symbols<br />

denote the components of the matrices<br />

σ AA′<br />

n<br />

σ 0 = − 1 √<br />

2<br />

I , σ a = 1 √<br />

2<br />

× Pauli matrix , (5.75)<br />

with raising and lowering of indices by ɛ AB , ɛ AB , ɛ A′ B ′ , ɛ A′ B ′, which are all given<br />

in matrix form by ( )<br />

0 1<br />

,<br />

−1 0<br />

see for example, Wess and Bagger (1992), Sexl and Urbantke (2001) for more<br />

details on this formalism. The inverse of (5.74) is given by<br />

e n µ = −σn AA ′eAA′ µ , (5.76)<br />

where σAA n is obtained from ′<br />

σAA′ n by raising and lowering indices. One can go<br />

from tensors to spinors via e AA′<br />

µ and from spinors to tensors via e µ AA ′.<br />

One can now rewrite the action (2.142) in two-component language. Instead<br />

of e n µ (vierbein) and ψµ α (gravitino), one works with the spinor-valued one-form<br />

e AA′<br />

µ and the spinor-valued one-form ψ A µ<br />

plus its Hermitian conjugate ¯ψ<br />

A′<br />

µ .The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!