13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

QUANTUM THEORY OF COLLAPSING DUST SHELLS 225<br />

on a fixed background manifold M. Here, the corresponding functions A and R<br />

have the form<br />

A(η, M, w; U, V ) , R(η, M, w; U, V ) , (7.76)<br />

and the trajectory of the shell on the background manifold is simply U = u for<br />

η =+1andV = v for η = −1.<br />

The next step is the explicit transformation to embedding variables (the<br />

Kuchař decomposition). The standard (ADM) formulation of the shell was studied<br />

in Louko et al. (1998); see also Kraus and Wilczek (1995). The spherically<br />

symmetric metric is written in the form<br />

ds 2 = −N 2 dτ 2 + L 2 (dρ + N ρ dτ) 2 + R 2 dΩ 2 , (7.77)<br />

and the shell is described by its radial coordinate ρ = r. The action reads<br />

∫ [ ∫<br />

]<br />

S 0 = dτ pṙ + dρ(P L ˙L + PR Ṙ − H 0 ) , (7.78)<br />

and the Hamiltonian is<br />

H 0 = NH ⊥ + N ρ H ρ + N ∞ E ∞ ,<br />

where N ∞ := lim ρ→∞ N(ρ), E ∞ is the ADM mass, and N and N ρ are the lapse<br />

and shift functions. The constraints read<br />

H ⊥ = LP L<br />

2<br />

2R 2 − P LP R<br />

R<br />

+ RR′′<br />

L − RR′ L ′<br />

L 2 + R′2<br />

2L − L 2 + ηp δ(ρ − r) ≈ 0 (7.79)<br />

L<br />

H ρ = P R R ′ − P LL ′ − pδ(ρ − r) ≈ 0 , (7.80)<br />

where the prime (dot) denotes the derivative with respect to ρ (τ). These are<br />

the same constraints as in (7.22) and (7.24), except for the contribution of the<br />

shell.<br />

ThetaskistotransformthevariablesintheactionS 0 . This transformation<br />

will be split into two steps. The first step is a transformation of the canonical<br />

coordinates r, p, L, P L , R, andP R at the constraint surface Γ defined by the<br />

constraints (7.79) and (7.80). The new coordinates are u and p u = −M for<br />

η =+1,v and p v = −M for η = −1, and the embedding variables U(ρ) and<br />

V (ρ).<br />

The second step is an extension of the functions u, v, p u , p v , U(ρ), P U (ρ),<br />

V (ρ), and P V (ρ) out of the constraint surface, where the functions u, v, p u ,<br />

p v , U(ρ), and V (ρ) are defined by the above transformation, and P U (ρ), P V (ρ)<br />

by P U (ρ)| Γ = P V (ρ)| Γ = 0. The extension must satisfy the condition that the<br />

functions form a canonical chart in a neighbourhood of Γ. That such an extension<br />

exists was shown in Hájíček and Kijowski (2000). The details of the calculation<br />

can be found in Hájíček and <strong>Kiefer</strong> (2001a). The result is the action<br />

∫<br />

∫ ∫ ∞<br />

S = dτ (p u ˙u + p v ˙v − np u p v )+ dτ dρ(P U ˙U + PV ˙V − H) , (7.81)<br />

where H = N U P U +N V P V ,andn, N U (ρ), and N V (ρ) are Lagrange multipliers.<br />

The first term in (7.81) contains the physical variables (observables), while the<br />

0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!