13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172 QUANTUM GEOMETRODYNAMICS<br />

∫<br />

∂<br />

∂t |ψ(t)〉 = d 3 x ḣab(x,t) δ<br />

δh ab (x) |ψ[h ab]〉 . (5.160)<br />

This, then, leads to the functional Schrödinger equation for quantized matter<br />

fields in the chosen external classical gravitational field,<br />

i ∂ ∂t |ψ(t)〉 = Ĥm |ψ(t)〉 ,<br />

∫<br />

Ĥ m ≡ d 3 {N(x)Ĥm }<br />

x<br />

⊥ (x)+N a (x)Ĥm a (x) . (5.161)<br />

Here, Ĥ m is the matter-field Hamiltonian in the Schrödinger picture, parametrically<br />

depending on (generally non-static) metric coefficients of the curved<br />

space–time background. This equation is the analogue of (5.140) in the quantummechanical<br />

example. (The back-reaction terms have again been absorbed into the<br />

phase of |ψ(t)〉.) The standard concept of time in quantum theory thus emerges<br />

only in a semiclassical approximation—the Wheeler–DeWitt equation itself is<br />

‘timeless’. 20<br />

Such a derivation of quantum field theory from the Wheeler–DeWitt equations<br />

dates back, on the level of cosmological models, to DeWitt (1967a). It was<br />

later performed by Lapchinsky and Rubakov (1979) for generic gravitational<br />

systems and discussed in various contexts in Banks (1985), Halliwell and Hawking<br />

(1985), Hartle (1987), <strong>Kiefer</strong> (1987), Barvinsky (1989), Brout and Venturi<br />

(1989), Singh and Padmanabhan (1989), Parentani (2000), and others; see also<br />

Anderson (2006a, b) for a general discussion. Although performed on a formal<br />

level only, this derivation yields an important bridge connecting the full theory<br />

of quantum <strong>gravity</strong> with the limit of quantum field theory in an external<br />

space–time; it lies behind many cosmological applications.<br />

This ‘Born–Oppenheimer type of approach’ is also well suited for the calculation<br />

of quantum-gravitational correction terms to the Schrödinger equation<br />

(5.161). This will be discussed in the next subsection. As a preparation it is,<br />

however, most appropriate to introduce again a condensed, so-called ‘DeWitt’,<br />

notation; cf. Section 2.2. We introduce the notation<br />

q i = h ab (x) , p i = p ab (x) , (5.162)<br />

in which the condensed index i =(ab, x) includes both discrete tensor indices<br />

and three-dimensional spatial coordinates x. In this way, the situation is formally<br />

the same as for a finite-dimensional model. A similar notation can be introduced<br />

for the constraints,<br />

Hµ g (q, p) =(Hg ⊥ (x), Hg a (x)) , Hm µ (q, ϕ, p ϕ)=(H⊥ m (x), Hm a (x)) . (5.163)<br />

The index µ enumerates the superhamiltonian and supermomenta of the theory<br />

as well as their spatial coordinates, µ → (µ, x). In this notation, the functional<br />

20 An attempt to extrapolate the standard interpretational framework of quantum theory<br />

into the ‘timeless realm’ is the use of ‘evolving constants’ in the Heisenberg picture by Rovelli<br />

(1991b).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!