13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MINISUPERSPACE MODELS 253<br />

( )<br />

∂<br />

2<br />

Ĥψ(a, χ) ≡ (−H a + H χ )ψ ≡<br />

∂a 2 − ∂2<br />

∂χ 2 − a2 + χ 2 ψ =0. (8.28)<br />

This has the form of an ‘indefinite oscillator’—two harmonic oscillators distinguished<br />

by a relative sign in the Hamiltonian. The model defined by (8.28) is<br />

the simplest non-trivial model in quantum cosmology. (It also arises from scalar–<br />

tensor theories of <strong>gravity</strong>; cf. Lidsey 1995.) Its classical solutions are represented<br />

by Lissajou ellipses confined to a rectangle in configuration space. The corresponding<br />

wave packets are obtained if a normalization condition is imposed with<br />

respect to a and χ. In this way, one obtains an ordinary quantum-mechanical<br />

Hilbert space. The wave packets follow here the classical Lissajous ellipses without<br />

dispersion (<strong>Kiefer</strong> 1990; Gousheh and Sepangi 2000). From (8.28), one finds<br />

H a ϕ n (a)ϕ n (χ) =H χ ϕ n (a)ϕ n (χ) ,<br />

where ϕ n denote again the usual harmonic-oscillator eigenfunctions. A wavepacket<br />

solution can then be constructed according to<br />

ψ(a, χ) = ∑ n<br />

A n ϕ n (a)ϕ n (χ) = ∑ n<br />

H n (a)H n (χ)<br />

A n<br />

2 n e −a2 /2−χ 2 /2 , (8.29)<br />

n!<br />

with suitable coefficients A n . From the properties of the Hermite polynomials,<br />

it is evident that the wave packet has to satisfy the ‘initial condition’ ψ(0,χ)=<br />

ψ(0, −χ). The requirement of normalizability thus gives a restriction on possible<br />

initial conditions. A particular example of such a wave-packet solution is depicted<br />

in Fig. 8.2. One recognizes a superposition of (half of) two Lissajous ellipses.<br />

In a more general oscillator model one would expect to find two different<br />

frequencies for a and χ, that is, instead of the potential −a 2 + χ 2 , one would<br />

have −ωa 2a2 + ωχ 2χ2 . The demand for normalizability would then entail the commensurability<br />

condition<br />

ω χ<br />

= 2n a +1<br />

ω a 2n χ +1 , (8.30)<br />

where n a and n χ are integer numbers. Thus, one gets from normalizability a<br />

restriction on the ‘coupling constants’ of this model. It is imaginable that such<br />

conditions may also hold in the full theory, for example, for the cosmological<br />

constant. 3<br />

As Page (1991) has demonstrated, one can map various minisuperspace models<br />

into each other. He also presents a plenty of classical and quantum solutions<br />

for these models. For example, one can find a map between the cases of minimally<br />

and non-minimally coupled scalar fields. The fields have to be rescaled and,<br />

what is most important, they differ in the range of allowed values. As mentioned<br />

above, this has consequences for the initial value problem in quantum <strong>gravity</strong><br />

3 Quantization conditions for the cosmological constant may also arise in string theory; cf.<br />

Bousso and Polchinski (2000) and Feng et al. (2001).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!