13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86 PARAMETRIZED AND RELATIONAL SYSTEMS<br />

term, one cannot implement the constraints L m ≈ 0 in the quantum theory as<br />

restrictions on wave functions, that is, one cannot have ˆL m |ψ〉 =0forallm.<br />

Instead, one can choose<br />

ˆL n |ψ〉 =0,n>0 , ˆL0 |ψ〉 = a|ψ〉 . (3.63)<br />

It turns out that Weyl invariance can only be preserved at the quantum level<br />

for a =1andD = 26, see for example, Polchinski (1998a) and Chapter 9. This<br />

is achieved by the presence of Faddeev–Popov ghost degrees of freedom whose<br />

central charge cancels against the central charge c of the fields X µ precisely for<br />

D = 26. It is most elegantly treated by ‘BRST quantization’ (see Section 9.2),<br />

leading to an equation of the form Q B |Ψ tot 〉 =0,whereQ B is the BRST charge.<br />

This weaker condition replaces the direct quantum implementation of the constraints.<br />

Going back to the classical theory, one can also define the quantities<br />

˜L n = 1 ∫ ( √ )<br />

dσ e inσ (X′ )<br />

2<br />

2 H ⊥ + H 1 . (3.64)<br />

Using the Poisson-bracket relations between the constraints H ⊥ and H 1 (see in<br />

particular Section 3.3), one can show that<br />

{ ˜L m , ˜L n } = −i(m − n)˜L m+n , (3.65)<br />

which coincides with the Virasoro algebra (3.61). In fact, for the gauge fixing<br />

considered here—leading to (3.58)—one has ˜L n = L n . The result (3.62) then<br />

shows that the naive implementation of the constraints (3.48) and (3.49) may<br />

be inconsistent. This is a general problem in the quantization of constrained<br />

systems and will be discussed further in Section 5.3. Kuchař and Torre (1991)<br />

have treated the bosonic string as a model for quantum <strong>gravity</strong>. They have shown<br />

that a covariant (covariant with respect to diffeomorphisms of the worldsheet)<br />

quantization is possible, that is, there exists a quantization procedure in which<br />

the algebra of constraints contains no anomalous terms. This is achieved by<br />

extracting internal time variables (‘embeddings’) which are not represented as<br />

operators. 5 A potential problem is the dependence of the theory on the choice<br />

of embedding. This is in fact a general problem; see Section 5.2. Kuchař and<br />

Torre make use of the fact that string theory is an ‘already-parametrized theory’,<br />

which brings us to a detailed discussion of parametrized field theories in the next<br />

section.<br />

3.3 Parametrized field theories<br />

This example is a generalization of the parametrized non-relativistic particle<br />

discussed in Section 3.1.1. As it will be field theoretic by nature, it has similarities<br />

5 The anomaly is still present in a subgroup of the conformal group, but it does not disturb<br />

the Dirac quantization of the constraints.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!