13.06.2015 Views

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

Kiefer C. Quantum gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

WHY QUANTUM GRAVITY?<br />

1.1 <strong>Quantum</strong> theory and the gravitational field<br />

1.1.1 Introduction<br />

<strong>Quantum</strong> theory seems to be a universal theory of nature. More precisely, it<br />

provides a general framework for all theories describing particular interactions.<br />

<strong>Quantum</strong> theory has passed a plethora of experimental tests and is considered<br />

a well-established theory, except for the ongoing discussion about its interpretational<br />

foundations.<br />

The only interaction that has not been fully accommodated within quantum<br />

theory is the gravitational field, the oldest known interaction. It is described very<br />

successfully by a classical (i.e. non-quantum) theory, Einstein’s general theory of<br />

relativity (GR), also called geometrodynamics. From a theoretical, or even aesthetic,<br />

point of view, it is highly appealing, since the fundamental equations can<br />

be formulated in simple geometrical terms. Moreover, there now exist plenty of<br />

experimental tests that have been passed by this theory without problems. One<br />

particularly impressive example is the case of the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16:<br />

the decrease of its orbital period can be fully explained by the emission of gravitational<br />

waves as predicted by GR. The accuracy of this test is only limited by<br />

the accuracy of clocks on Earth, which according to recent proposals for rubidium<br />

fountain clocks (Fertig and Gibble 2000) should approach an accuracy of<br />

about 10 −16 (such a clock would go wrong by less than 1 s during a time as long<br />

as the age of the Universe). The precision is so high that one even needs to model<br />

the gravitational influence of the Milky Way on the binary pulsar in order to<br />

find agreement with the theoretical prediction (Damour and Taylor 1991). There<br />

exist phenomena that could point to a more fundamental theory than GR (Dark<br />

Matter, Dark Energy, Pioneer anomaly), but this is not yet clear.<br />

The formalism of general relativity is discussed in many textbooks; see, for<br />

example, Hawking and Ellis (1973), Misner et al. (1973), Straumann (2004), or<br />

Wald (1984). It can be defined by the Einstein–Hilbert action,<br />

∫<br />

S EH =<br />

c4<br />

d 4 x √ ∫<br />

−g (R − 2Λ) −<br />

c4<br />

d 3 x √ hK . (1.1)<br />

16πG<br />

8πG<br />

M<br />

Note that c 4 /16πG ≈ 2.41 × 10 47 gcms −2 ≈ 2.29 × 10 74 (cm s) −1 . The integration<br />

in the first integral of (1.1) covers a region M of the space–time manifold,<br />

and the second integral is defined on its boundary ∂M whichisassumedto<br />

be space-like. The integrand of the latter contains the determinant, h, ofthe<br />

three-dimensional metric on the boundary, and K is the trace of the second<br />

∂M<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!