02.07.2015 Views

john f. kennedy space center brevard county, florida - Environmental ...

john f. kennedy space center brevard county, florida - Environmental ...

john f. kennedy space center brevard county, florida - Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Space Shuttle Program Historic Properties 3-2<br />

NASA Kennedy Space Center<br />

The conceptual origins of NASA’s Space Shuttle began in the mid-1950s, when the<br />

Department of Defense (DoD) began to explore the feasibility of a reusable launch<br />

vehicle in <strong>space</strong>. The primary use of the vehicle was for military operations including<br />

piloted reconnaissance, anti-satellite interception, and weapons delivery (Williamson<br />

1999:162). A wide variety of concepts were explored and the X-20 Dyna-Soar (Dynamic<br />

Soaring) was chosen. In November 1958, NASA joined with the Air Force on the Dyna-<br />

Soar project, which envisioned a “delta-winged glider that would take one pilot to orbit,<br />

carry out a mission, and glide back to a runway landing” boosted into orbit atop a Titan II<br />

or III (Williamson 1999:162). However, given limited available funds and the competing<br />

priorities of other programs, the Dyna-Soar program was cancelled in December 1963<br />

(Williamson 1999:162).<br />

In 1965, the Air Force and NASA established an ad hoc subpanel to determine the status<br />

of the technology that was needed to support the development of a Reusable Launch<br />

Vehicle. Included in their 1966 report were a variety of design and launch concepts using<br />

fully and partially reusable systems (Williamson 1999:164).<br />

George Mueller, the head of the Office of Manned Space Flight at NASA Headquarters,<br />

believed that following Apollo, a large <strong>space</strong> station, supported by low-cost, reliable<br />

launch vehicles, was the next logical program for NASA (Jenkins 2001:77; Logsdon et<br />

al. 1999:202-205). Testifying before the Senate Space Committee on February 28, 1968,<br />

he stressed the importance of a new approach to <strong>space</strong> logistics. Later that year, in an<br />

August speech before the British Interplanetary Society, Mueller stated:<br />

Essential to the continuous operation of the <strong>space</strong> shuttle will be the<br />

capability to resupply expendables as well as to change and/or augment<br />

crews and laboratory equipment . . . Our studies show that using today’s<br />

hardware, the resupply cost for a year equals the original cost of the<br />

<strong>space</strong> station. . . Therefore, there is a real requirement for an efficient<br />

earth-to-orbit transportation system - an economical <strong>space</strong> shuttle . . . The<br />

shuttle ideally would be able to operate in a mode similar to that of large<br />

commercial air transports and be compatible with the environment at<br />

major airports. . . (Jenkins 2001: 78).<br />

In 1968, NASA convened the Space Shuttle Task Group and, through the Manned<br />

Spacecraft Center (MSC) (later named Johnson Space Center [JSC]) and the MSFC, the<br />

group issued a request for proposals for an Integral Launch and Reentry Vehicle (ILRV)<br />

system. As initially conceptualized, the Space Shuttle, designed to be completely<br />

reusable, would be part rocket, part orbiting <strong>space</strong>craft, and part airplane. Supported by a<br />

fleet of five vehicles, each designed for a maximum of 100 reuses, the primary use of this<br />

low-cost <strong>space</strong> transportation system was to provide logistical support of the Space<br />

Station. The reusable nature was expected to reduce payload costs.<br />

October 2007<br />

Archaeological Consultants, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!