10.07.2015 Views

Transportation 2035 - State of Rhode Island: Division of Planning

Transportation 2035 - State of Rhode Island: Division of Planning

Transportation 2035 - State of Rhode Island: Division of Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

December 2012NEEDS ASSESSMENTThe nation and most states are facing severe fiscal crises in their transportation programs. Revenues from fuel taxes have been stagnant and have not beenindexed to inflation. On the expense side, construction and materials costs have increased enormously. Consequently, continued reliance on the samerevenue sources will result in ever diminishing transportation programs. Many states are looking at drastic measures to correct this situation such as dramatictoll increases or new tolls, fuel tax hikes, mileage taxes, and outright sale or lease <strong>of</strong> state assets. The funding model for financing transportation in the United<strong>State</strong>s is 50 years old, and a fundamental overhaul may be on the horizon.<strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong>’s long range plan, out <strong>of</strong> necessity, is based on the current funding level as new revenue sources are not yet forthcoming. This current path doesnot permit the state to maintain its infrastructure as it should, leading to a downward spiral <strong>of</strong> the transportation system. In order to begin the dialogue onwhat our needs are and how we can afford to pay for necessary improvements, a system level analysis was undertaken that defines four levels <strong>of</strong>transportation investment.This topic deserves far more attention and study than can be devoted to it in a few pages <strong>of</strong> this Plan. This analysis is a modest RIDOT/RISPP staff effort toprovide order <strong>of</strong> magnitude numbers. It includes capital and operating expenses, state and federal resources, and highway and transit modes. Each scenario isa point in time and does not consider change in VMT, change in price or consumption <strong>of</strong> gas, variable fees/tolls for heavy vehicles, personnel or constructioncost increases, or new technologies. Change in debt service over time is not reflected. Locations for tolled highways are not specified. Earmarks have notbeen considered in the analysis.The four scenarios are as follows:SINKThe Sink Scenario assumes that there are no new funding sources, and the state will continue to rely on current taxes and generalobligation bonds to match federal funds. This is a recipe for disaster as has been pointed out in previous transportation plans.Deferred maintenance and highway projects are the result <strong>of</strong> this unsustainable system. In this scenario, GARVEE projects andbridges demanding immediate attention are the priorities. RIPTA bus and ferry services are cut. Please note that this scenario doesNOT reflect the worst case scenario. Revenues from the Highway Trust Fund may decrease by 35 percent next year if Congressionalaction is not taken.This scenarioprovides for no newsources <strong>of</strong> revenue.The TIP for FY 2009-2012 reflects thislevel <strong>of</strong> funding.<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>2035</strong> (2012 Update)<strong>State</strong> Guide Plan Element 611<strong>Rhode</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>State</strong>wide <strong>Planning</strong> ProgramPage 2-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!