10.07.2015 Views

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116signs on or near the bridge that might lead to an estimate <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>and</strong> manufacturer <strong>of</strong>the existing bridge. Figure 5.1 is an example <strong>of</strong> a typical sign that marks the year thebridge was constructed <strong>and</strong> the manufacturer.Once the manufacturer <strong>and</strong> age <strong>of</strong> the bridge is collected, an estimate can be made<strong>of</strong> the materials utilized in the existing bridge. Typically in the Midwest, bridges thatwere constructed approximately before the late 1890s consist <strong>of</strong> historic wrought irontension members with either wrought iron, cast iron, or timber compression members.Bridges constructed approximately after the late 1890’s were primarily constructed usingsteel.Often it is useful to fully clean a piece <strong>of</strong> metal by removing any surfacecorrosion <strong>and</strong> investigate its surface appearance to determine if the metal is wrought iron.This is because wrought iron has distinctive slag inclusions that are <strong>of</strong>ten present on thesurface <strong>of</strong> the metal <strong>and</strong> visible by the naked eye. These inclusions are typically darkerthan the rest <strong>of</strong> the metal <strong>and</strong> are elongated in one direction. Figure 5.2 is a photograph<strong>of</strong> a test coupon that shows some <strong>of</strong> these large surface inclusions.If during the bridge inspection some fractured tension members are found, theappearance <strong>of</strong> the fractured surface could help to identify if the metal is wrought iron orsteel. <strong>Wrought</strong> iron’s fractured surfaces that had failed in tension are typically fibrous<strong>and</strong> jagged in nature unlike typical smooth <strong>and</strong> angled fractured surfaces <strong>of</strong> steel.Typically there is very little necking near the fractured surface <strong>of</strong> wrought iron which iscommon in steel. Figures 4.4 <strong>and</strong> 4.5 illustrate the differences between the fracturesurface for both wrought iron <strong>and</strong> steel.If it is determined that the bridge being investigated is most likely historicalwrought iron, the AASHTO Manual for Condition <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bridges (1994)recommends using an operating maximum unit stress <strong>of</strong> 20,000 psi, <strong>and</strong> an inventorymaximum unit stress <strong>of</strong> 14,000 psi when determining the load rating for these bridges.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!