160Table A.4 (continued) Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wrought</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> Bar Tensile Strength, Elastic Limit(Yield Strength) Data <strong>of</strong> 959 Specimens Reported by Beardslee1.25 D 2 57,601 57,977 31,9961.25 P 2 55,420 55,782 35,5961.25 Px 2 55,969 56,334 33,9211.25 N 2 56,112 56,478 33,2511.25 Fx1 6 54,895 55,253 34,7841.25 D 1 55,190 55,550 28,1661.25 E 1 53,544 53,893 32,7121.25 Fx2 3 54,775 55,132 38,6031.25 Fx3 2 52,902 53,247 32,5201.25 A 3 53,548 53,897 27,6431.25 M 20 53,403 53,7521.25 M 20 53,739 54,0901.25 F 2 52,627 52,970 32,0751.25 F 2 52,387 52,729 39,6081.25 M 20 52,678 53,0221.25 F 5 52,279 52,620 33,2201.25 O 1 49,716 50,040 30,7301.31 P 94 73,724 54,518 35,8981.38 M 48 87,454 58,926 37,5481.38 M 35 85,559 57,649 38,5781.38 D 1 86,111 58,021 32,1521.67 K 2 121,653 55,790 31,0341.67 C 1 119,819 54,949 31,0301.67 M 28 118,563 54,373 35,8201.67 N 2 118,354 54,277 33,6221.67 Fx1 5 115,500 52,968 33,2751.67 Fx3 2 114,987 52,733 34,6061.67 E 1 113,943 52,254 25,9301.67 A 3 116,784 53,557 33,6501.67 P 1 114,601 52,556 30,8021.67 F 5 114,560 52,537 34,4691.67 F 2 114,128 52,339 39,1031.67 M 4 115,604 53,016 35,3791.67 Fx2 3 112,270 51,487 35,9111.67 F 2 111,854 51,296 31,9921.67 O 1 110,323 50,594 34,9401.44 P 1 86,532 53,3451.44 E 1 87,504 53,944 32,5431.44 G 1 86,359 53,238 32,5341.44 B 4 84,816 52,287 32,4111.44 C 1 83,955 51,756 32,6551.44 J 1 81,755 50,4001.50 M 12 100,768 57,052 38,4171.50 K 2 101,236 57,317 33,4121.50 D 1 99,802 56,505 32,4961.50 M 25 97,967 55,466 34,7801.50 M 26 97,375 55,131 33,7711.50 P 2 95,658 54,159 33,140
161Table A.4 (continued) Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wrought</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> Bar Tensile Strength, Elastic Limit(Yield Strength) Data <strong>of</strong> 959 Specimens Reported by Beardslee1.50 M 17 96,331 54,5401.50 C 4 97,857 55,404 34,7701.50 E 1 97,877 55,415 32,8691.50 M 20 96,819 54,816 34,7161.50 Px 2 96,003 54,354 34,6171.50 M 27 95,545 54,095 35,5441.50 E 1 96,338 54,544 33,0271.50 P 1 96,911 54,868 29,6361.50 M 20 94,516 53,5121.50 M 23 93,507 52,9411.50 Fx3 2 93,292 52,819 34,8401.50 Fx1 5 94,478 53,491 34,3071.50 M 4 94,592 53,555 34,9011.50 N 2 93,081 52,700 34,6901.50 C 1 92,661 52,462 35,8801.50 H 1 92,119 52,155 29,9921.50 D 1 91,640 51,884 27,7081.50 A 2 91,834 51,994 28,7941.50 F 2 89,936 50,919 32,0541.50 O 1 90,884 51,456 32,3121.50 F 5 90,928 51,481 34,5911.50 Fx2 3 90,162 51,047 34,9171.50 J 1 90,162 51,0471.50 M 1 87,062 49,292 32,5971.63 N 2 116,795 56,344 35,8891.63 K 4 118,428 57,132 35,0261.63 M 10 118,988 57,402 35,7011.63 P 2 115,323 55,634 33,5221.63 C 4 116,552 56,227 33,2071.63 Px 2 113,364 54,689 33,4271.63 A 2 112,628 54,334 32,1631.63 D 1 111,304 53,695 30,0871.63 Fx3 2 110,566 53,339 33,5401.63 T 5 110,976 53,537 34,3351.63 D 1 111,136 53,614 30,6641.63 J 1 109,341 52,7481.63 E 1 109,190 52,675 33,7451.63 Fx2 3 110,771 53,438 35,8701.63 H 1 108,441 52,314 29,3641.63 E 1 107,678 51,946 27,6951.63 O 1 108,622 52,401 34,0121.63 F 2 108,128 52,163 33,9071.63 G 1 106,142 51,205 33,3181.63 F 2 104,741 50,529 35,3901.63 F 5 105,655 50,970 33,6251.63 C 1 101,634 49,030 31,0991.69 K 1 126,513 56,595 38,310
- Page 1 and 2:
Purdue UniversityPurdue e-PubsJTRP
- Page 3:
1. Report No. 2. Government Accessi
- Page 6 and 7:
epairing a bent wrought iron tensio
- Page 8 and 9:
vPageCHAPTER 3TEST PROCEDURES FOR M
- Page 10 and 11:
ixLIST OF FIGURESFigurePageFigure 1
- Page 12 and 13:
xiFigurePageFigure 3.30 Top View of
- Page 14 and 15:
xiiiFigurePageFigure 5.12 Typical T
- Page 16 and 17:
xvAppendix FigurePageFigure D.7 Ini
- Page 18 and 19:
viiiAppendix TablePageTable A.5 Det
- Page 20 and 21:
iiiThe authors would also like to t
- Page 22 and 23:
2but also what material properties
- Page 24 and 25:
4microstructure of the metal. The c
- Page 26 and 27:
62. LITERATURE SEARCHBefore experim
- Page 28 and 29:
8imperfections, the performance of
- Page 30 and 31:
10wrought iron. Adding the slag aft
- Page 32 and 33:
12method for manufacturing wrought
- Page 34 and 35:
14patents for their process and tra
- Page 36 and 37:
16This method of testing of structu
- Page 38 and 39:
18plot of this percent elongation d
- Page 40 and 41:
20significant variation in the perc
- Page 42 and 43:
22The practice of restoring histori
- Page 44 and 45:
24Elleby, Wallace W. Sanders, F. Wa
- Page 46 and 47:
26From all the surveys that were di
- Page 48 and 49:
28Table 2.1 Average Ultimate Streng
- Page 50 and 51:
30Figure 2.3 Wrought Iron “Sponge
- Page 52 and 53:
32Histogram of Kirkaldy Wrought Iro
- Page 54 and 55:
34Percent Occurance in Range - %45.
- Page 56 and 57:
3660Combined Wrought Iron BarsTensi
- Page 58 and 59:
38The Bell Ford Bridge consisted of
- Page 60 and 61:
40Two. These samples were taken fro
- Page 62 and 63:
42specimens were of constant cross
- Page 64 and 65:
44Along with rectangular tensile co
- Page 66 and 67:
46After the initial test loading wa
- Page 68 and 69:
483.6 Fatigue TestingTo develop a b
- Page 70 and 71:
50The final specimen category consi
- Page 72 and 73:
52This analysis was completed using
- Page 74 and 75:
54After the initial test was comple
- Page 76 and 77:
56completed, but before the surface
- Page 78 and 79:
58readings, load cell readings and
- Page 80 and 81:
60Figure 3.3 Donated Eyebars 4 and
- Page 82 and 83:
62Figure 3.7 Heated Areas in Blue o
- Page 84 and 85:
64Figure 3.11 Detail Used in Groove
- Page 86 and 87:
66900080007000y = 27.153xR 2 = 0.99
- Page 88 and 89:
68Figure 3.19 Charpy Impact Testing
- Page 90 and 91:
70Figure 3.23 Eyebar Connection in
- Page 92 and 93:
72Figure 3.27 Eyebar A After Filler
- Page 94 and 95:
74Figure 3.31 Side View of Finished
- Page 96 and 97:
76Figure 3.35 Front View of Eyebar
- Page 98 and 99:
78strength from the existence of pe
- Page 100 and 101:
80The carbon content present in the
- Page 102 and 103:
82value may not be very accurate bu
- Page 104 and 105:
84strengths was found to be 29,940
- Page 106 and 107:
86wrought iron bars were investigat
- Page 108 and 109:
88stresses are induced. These perma
- Page 110 and 111:
90toughness the material. The test
- Page 112 and 113:
92From the finite element analysis,
- Page 114 and 115:
94Table 4.1 Chemical Analysis of Ey
- Page 116 and 117:
96Table 4.3 Tensile Coupon Test Res
- Page 118 and 119:
98Table 4.5 Charpy Impact Test Resu
- Page 120 and 121:
100Table 4.7 Comparison of Strain G
- Page 122 and 123:
102Figure 4.1 Typical Micrograph of
- Page 124 and 125:
104Figure 4.5 Fracture Surface of D
- Page 126 and 127:
106Comparison of Tensile Strengthfo
- Page 128 and 129:
108Combined Wrought Iron Bar Histor
- Page 130 and 131: 110Figure 4.17 Macrograph of Weld u
- Page 132 and 133: 112Figure 4.21 Cleavage Fracture of
- Page 134 and 135: Figure 4.25 Elongation of Hole in E
- Page 136 and 137: 116signs on or near the bridge that
- Page 138 and 139: 118testing of historic wrought iron
- Page 140 and 141: 120so that they would act in symmet
- Page 142 and 143: 122The reasons for the differences
- Page 144 and 145: 124The second corrosion pattern mod
- Page 146 and 147: 126Keating (1984) stated that the s
- Page 148 and 149: 128charcoal fire until it is red ho
- Page 150 and 151: 130Figure 5.3 Picture of Bottom Cho
- Page 152 and 153: 132Figure 5.7 Using Force After Usi
- Page 154 and 155: 134Figure 5.11 Reassembling a Pin C
- Page 156 and 157: 1366. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPL
- Page 158 and 159: 138rectangular in shape. These eyeb
- Page 160 and 161: 140were joined together with a full
- Page 162 and 163: 1424. The Charpy impact energy of t
- Page 164 and 165: 144connections are unsymmetrical, i
- Page 166 and 167: 146LIST OF REFERENCESAASHTO (1998).
- Page 168 and 169: 148Hodgkinson, Eaton (1840). Experi
- Page 170 and 171: 150Appendix A. Data Collected From
- Page 172 and 173: 152Table A.1 Wrought Iron Bar Tensi
- Page 174 and 175: 154Table A.1 (continued) Wrought Ir
- Page 176 and 177: 156Table A.2 (continued) Wrought Ir
- Page 178 and 179: 158Table A.3 Wrought Iron Angle Ten
- Page 182 and 183: 162Table A.4 (continued) Summary of
- Page 184 and 185: 164Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 186 and 187: 166Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 188 and 189: 168Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 190 and 191: 170Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 192 and 193: 172Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 194 and 195: 174Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 196 and 197: 176Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 198 and 199: 178Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 200 and 201: 180Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 202 and 203: 182Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 204 and 205: 184Table A.7 Tensile Strength Data
- Page 206 and 207: 186Table B.1 Example Historic Wroug
- Page 208 and 209: 188DepartmentofTransportationIf you
- Page 210 and 211: 190CountyIf your organizationdoes m
- Page 212 and 213: 192County 16: County bridge inspect
- Page 214 and 215: 194State 13: Included in original d
- Page 216 and 217: 196Figure C.1 Diagrams Showing Loca
- Page 218 and 219: 198Figure C.3 Heating of Eyebar fro
- Page 220 and 221: 200Figure C.7 Double V Butt Joint u
- Page 222 and 223: 202Figure C. 11 Welded Tensile Coup
- Page 224 and 225: 204Figure C.15 Tensile Coupon from
- Page 226 and 227: 206Figure C.19 Cooling Bath with Su
- Page 228 and 229: 208Figure C.23 Side View of Eyebar
- Page 230 and 231:
210Figure C.27 Eyebar End Connectio
- Page 232 and 233:
212Appendix D. Welding Procedure fo
- Page 234 and 235:
214D.2 Filler Weld for Eyebar Conne
- Page 236 and 237:
216Figure D.1 Weld Joint Detail Use
- Page 238 and 239:
Figure D.5 Completed Weld Before Su
- Page 240 and 241:
220Figure D.7 Initial Pass Pattern