Agroindustrial project analysi

More documents

Recommendations

Info

164 AGROINDUSTRIAL PROJECT ANALYSISDryer 1970volume 1970 f.o.b. 1970 f.o.b. cost of trays, installed(cubic feet) dryer cost trucks, controls cost100 4,000 750 for trays (250 square feet 8,175at $3 a square foot)300 for 1 truck/rack400 for controls400 4,800 3,000 for trays (1,000 square 14,200feet at $3 a square foot)900 for 3 trucks800 for controls800 9,600 6,000 for trays (2,000 square 27,300feet at $3 a square foot)1,800 for 6 trucks800 for controlsThe operating cost estimates (given in the first tabulation, above)are derived according to the following assumptions:* Two man-hours to load/unload fifty trays or one truck in each12-hour drying cycleITwo and three-quarters pounds of steam or its equivalent inenergy is required to evaporate I pound of water• Maintenance cost of 3-5 percent of installed cost yearly for a300-day year* One-third man-hour to supervise the machine during drying* Unskilled labor at an hourly wage of $4* Three shifts and 24-hour operation* No amortization has been taken into consideration.By these assumptions, daily 1977 operating costs can be disaggregatedin the following tabulation:Dryer volume Trays(cubic feet) (number) Labor Maintenance100 50 48 1.80400 200 96 3.13800 400 160 6.00
COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY 165The component 1977 daily energy costs are tabulated as follows:Dryer volume(cubic feet)Energy100 15.50 (= 1,125 pounds of water evaporated X 2.75 poundsof steam X $5 per 1,000 pounds of steam)400 61.90 (= 4,500 pounds of water evaporated X 2.75 poundsof steam X $5 per 1,000 pounds of steam)800 123.75 (= 9,000 pounds of water evaporated X 2.75 poundsof steam X $5 per 1,000 pounds of steam)The cost estimates for the other technologies were derived insimilar fashion, but the details of the calculations and the sourcesfor some data used will not, for reasons of space, be listed in thethree comparative, summary tables that follow.
Page 1:
AgroindustrialProjectAnalysis James
Page 5 and 6:
AgroindustrialProject AnalysisJames
Page 7 and 8:
ContentsForeword by Ajit MozoomdarP
Page 10 and 11:
ForewordAGROINDUSTRY-that is, indus
Page 12 and 13:
XPREFACEThe following colleagues ga
Page 15 and 16:
IAn OverviewTHE PURPOSE OF THIS BOO
Page 17 and 18:
AN OVERVIEW 5ing factory must conte
Page 19 and 20:
AN OVERVIEW 7trialization occurs ca
Page 21 and 22:
AN OVERVIEW 9Table 1-2. Contributio
Page 23 and 24:
AN OVERVIEW 11cent; this far exceed
Page 25 and 26:
AN OVERVIEW 13By broadening its agr
Page 27 and 28:
AN OVERVIEW 15agroindustries from i
Page 29 and 30:
AN OVERVIEW 17focus than indicated
Page 31 and 32:
AN OVERVIEW 19be interested in cost
Page 33 and 34:
AN OVERVIEW 21that warrant further
Page 35 and 36:
AN OVERVIEW 23prises of different s
Page 37 and 38:
AN OVERVIEW 25an interactive proces
Page 39 and 40:
2The Marketing FactorTHE VIABILITY
Page 41 and 42:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 29testing cons
Page 43 and 44:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 31product to t
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 4. Illustrative Segmentation
Page 47 and 48:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 35ucts are pur
Page 49 and 50:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 37decisionmaki
Page 51 and 52:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 39gional, nati
Page 53 and 54:
Figure 5. Product Life Cycle (PLC)M
Page 55 and 56:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 43Institutiona
Page 57 and 58:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 45How do insti
Page 59 and 60:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 47ssl's may ne
Page 61 and 62:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 49the governme
Page 63 and 64:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 51consciousnes
Page 65 and 66:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 53FUNCTIONS. M
Page 67 and 68:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 55the processo
Page 69 and 70:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 57Responses by
Page 71 and 72:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 59* Likely com
Page 73 and 74:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 61Table 2-3. T
Page 75 and 76:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 63TIME-SERIES
Page 77 and 78:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 65ence of appr
Page 79 and 80:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 67Are the data
Page 81 and 82:
THE MARKETING FACTOR 69ect's market
Page 83 and 84:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 71* Cost. Th
Page 85 and 86:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 73the declin
Page 87 and 88:
TIIE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 75termine t
Page 89 and 90:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 77C- cost pe
Page 91 and 92:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 79Figure 7.
Page 93 and 94:
TBE PROCUREMENT FACTOR8itomato crop
Page 95 and 96:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 83Storage an
Page 97 and 98:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 85Is there c
Page 99 and 100:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 87desired re
Page 101 and 102:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 89of the qua
Page 103 and 104:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 91Even with
Page 105 and 106:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 93The firm s
Page 107 and 108:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 95A crop's a
Page 109 and 110:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 97Table 3-4.
Page 111 and 112:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 99the transp
Page 113 and 114:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 101credit or
Page 115 and 116:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 103firm's pr
Page 117 and 118:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 105Are multi
Page 119 and 120:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 107Seeds and
Page 121 and 122:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 109tion. Inc
Page 123 and 124:
THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 111size; emp
Page 125 and 126: THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 113Salient p
Page 127 and 128: THE PROCUREMENT FACTOR 115storage a
Page 129 and 130: 4The Processing FactorTHis STUDY HA
Page 131 and 132: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 119In milling
Page 133 and 134: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 121tion that
Page 135 and 136: n.a., Not applicable.Source: C. Pet
Page 137 and 138: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 125labor perm
Page 139 and 140: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 127tions have
Page 141 and 142: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 129season. Fi
Page 143 and 144: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 131sensitive
Page 145 and 146: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 133Table 4-4.
Page 147 and 148: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 135soluble nu
Page 149 and 150: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 137Food Produ
Page 151 and 152: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 139* Fragile
Page 153 and 154: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 141* Availabi
Page 155 and 156: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 143the cost o
Page 157 and 158: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 145cessor in
Page 159 and 160: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 14715 percent
Page 161 and 162: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 149and A. The
Page 163 and 164: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 151example, i
Page 165 and 166: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 153primary in
Page 167 and 168: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 155For more c
Page 169 and 170: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 157farmer's a
Page 171 and 172: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 159failed to
Page 173 and 174: THE PROCESSING FACTOR 16rbecause of
Page 175: COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY 163
Page 179 and 180: can process almost any eration); $0
Page 181 and 182: Pneumatic Batch or continuous $120,
Page 183 and 184: of previously driedproducts; best f
Page 185 and 186: Fluidized Continuous operation $372
Page 187 and 188: Plate Batch operation for $372,000
Page 189 and 190: system cookers (probably simi- to t
Page 191 and 192: CHECKLIST OF CRITICAL QUESTIONS 179
Page 193 and 194: CHECKLIST OF CRITICAL QUESTIONS 18I
Page 211 and 212: BibliographyTHE FOLLOWING WORKS AUG
Page 213 and 214: BiBLIOGRAPHY 201Scott, M., J. D. Ma
Page 215 and 216: BIBLIOGRAPHY 203Forecasting methods
Page 217 and 218: BIBLIOGRAPHY 205UNIDO. UNIDO Guides
Page 219 and 220: BIBLIOGRAPHY 207tional Affairs, no.
Page 221 and 222: IndexAdvertising, 42, 128; promotio
Page 223 and 224: INDEX 211development planning and,
Page 225 and 226: INDEX 213Social costs and benefits:
Page 228:
The World BankEconomic Development
show all

Agroindustrial project analysi

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?