11.07.2015 Views

Agroindustrial project analysi

Agroindustrial project analysi

Agroindustrial project analysi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

system cookers (probably simi- to that for hydro- cookers; also suited to processing lamilarto that for static cookers) nated flexible poucheshydrostaticcookers)Direct-flame Continuous operation Not available Not available (similar These sterilizers are suited to processsterilizersfor large-scale produc- to that for hydro- ing nonviscous foods in small contionof canned vege- static cookers) tainers; because of short sterilizationtables (particularly time (shorter than hydrolock or hydromushrooms);can static systems), products with veryprocess only small cans good organoleptic quality and nutrientretention can be made; because ofbuild-up of internal pressure duringheating, only small cans can be processedsatisfactorilyN Aseptic Continuous operation $1,130,000 for Low manual labor re- Extremely short sterilization time;sterilizer for large-scale produc- 200 tons daily quirement but skilled yields best organoleptic quality andtion of canned or bot- labor required for nutrient retention among all canningtled (or laminated operation and mainte- methods, but can process only fluidpouch-packaged) fluid nance; high mainte- foodsfoodsnance cost; $0.0018 perpound raw materialSterilmatic Continuous operation Not available Not available (similar Similar to hydrostatic cookersretort and for medium- to large- to that for hydroorbitantscale production of static cookers)canned foodsa. Cost estimates are based on data provided by A. K. Robins and Co. for still retorts; by F. K. Lawler ["The French BuildEfficient Canneries," Food Engineering, vol. 32, no. 3 (March 1960), p. 64) for hydrostatic cookers; and by the editors ofFood Engineering ["Aseptic Milk Makes N. American Debut," vol. 47, no. 9 (September 1975), p. 15] for aseptic sterilizingequipment. As in the other comparative tables, figures are updated by using the 1977 "M & S Equipment Cost Index."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!