11.07.2015 Views

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

February in <strong>Nanking</strong>, even at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> meridian sun (noon) when <strong>the</strong> ratio is <strong>the</strong>smallest (See Chart 2). The ratio is larger at all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r times and can never be largerthan 1.0. Thus, <strong>the</strong> location shown in this photograph cannot be <strong>Nanking</strong> at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Japanese occupation or immediately <strong>the</strong>re after.Judging from <strong>the</strong> clothing on <strong>the</strong> military men standing and <strong>the</strong> posture <strong>of</strong> thosesitting as shown in Photos 70-75, someone took <strong>the</strong>m at <strong>the</strong> same location at <strong>the</strong> identicaltime. The servicemen’s attire and <strong>the</strong> background dose not suggest that <strong>the</strong> photos weretaken during <strong>the</strong> winter. Since none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “16 Photos” in possession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research teamare clear enough for analysis, Photo C, which appears in RON-YY, will be subjected toanalysis here. As <strong>the</strong> next section will discuss, Photo C was obviously taken at <strong>the</strong> samelocation as Photo 73 was.Photo 66 Photo 66: QINHUA, p. 46136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!