11.07.2015 Views

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Photo A Photo 131Photo 131: Second Lieutenants Noda Tsuyoshi (right) and Mukai Toshiaki (left).Photographed at <strong>the</strong> eastern gate <strong>of</strong> Changzhou, to <strong>the</strong> east <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nanking</strong>, in late November1937. (Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Noda Masa).Photo A: “Two <strong>of</strong>ficers competing with each o<strong>the</strong>r to first kill 100: Noda Tsuyoshi (right)and Mukai Toshiaki (left). Photographed by correspondent Satō [Shinju] at Changzhou.”Tokyo Nichinichi Newspaper, 13 December 1937.The Tokyo Nichinichi Newspaper certainly entered a fine print that made clear whotook that image at what location—correspondent Satō Shinju at Changzhou, about 100kmeast <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nanking</strong>. But <strong>the</strong>re was no description <strong>of</strong> date. Such an insufficient explanationalmost surely misled <strong>the</strong> readers. Thus, <strong>the</strong> Tokyo Nichinichi Newspaper should be heldaccountable for having used Photo 131, which was actually taken in late November, as if ithad been a snapshot at <strong>the</strong> noon <strong>of</strong> December 10.The Asahi Newspaper started a journal article series entitled “Chūgoku no tabi”[trip in China] by Honda Katsuichi in August 1971—about one year prior to <strong>the</strong>normalization <strong>of</strong> Sino-Japanese diplomatic relationship in September <strong>the</strong> following year.A November 5, 1971, article in this series featured <strong>the</strong> story <strong>of</strong> this alleged killing contest204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!