11.07.2015 Views

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

discrepancy between <strong>the</strong> realities in <strong>Nanking</strong> on <strong>the</strong> one hand and what Steele described inhis article on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. (See Nankin “gyakustsu” kenkyū no saizensen, 2003 issue, p.275.)The research team identified 13 photographs <strong>of</strong> Steele. Of <strong>the</strong>se 13, two were not<strong>the</strong> scenes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nanking</strong> as Steele himself said. Of <strong>the</strong> remaining 11 which he took in<strong>Nanking</strong>, six depict locations in front <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zhonghua Gate. Somehow, none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sephotographs appeared in his articles on <strong>the</strong> paper. RON-YY, however, used <strong>the</strong>se photoPhoto D Photo 125Photos 125 and D: RON-YY, p. 44. Both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m—Photo 125 as printed in RON-YY, p.44, and Photo D, included in Nankin-jiken shiryō-shū (I)—depict <strong>the</strong> Zhonghua Gatealthough <strong>the</strong> latter source incorrectly identifies this as <strong>the</strong> Zhongshan Gate. The identicalChinese ideograph is seen painted on <strong>the</strong> wall in both images.196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!