11.07.2015 Views

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

inspired anti-Japanese sentiment among <strong>the</strong> population, and was on sale inthat country as a postcard.T publication Shina-tairiku no shinsō [The Truth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chinese Continent] alsomentioned <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> similar photographs, one <strong>of</strong> which showed a woman beingstabbed by someone. More recently, Nakada Takashi summarized <strong>the</strong> circumstancessurrounding <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> such images in his article “Nitchū-sensō-ki ni okeru Chūgokukokumintō no taigai senden katsudoō” [GMD international propaganda activities during <strong>the</strong>Sino-Japanese War] published in Seiji keizai shigaku [History <strong>of</strong> Politics and Economy], no.431.That this photograph was a fabrication was known at <strong>the</strong> time. As a result, for along time, it did not reappear in media sources. But recently, <strong>the</strong> following sourcesreprinted this photograph: Yang Kelin, Cao Hong, Zhongguo Kangri Tuzhi [PictorialHistory <strong>of</strong> China’s Resistance War], RON-YY, and REKISHI. In particular, REKISHIincluded Photo 99 in a section entitled <strong>the</strong> “mop-up operations in and outside <strong>the</strong> citywalls” with <strong>the</strong> following caption: “The Japanese army used live Chinese persons as guineapigs for bayonet practice to turn rookie soldiers into ‘murdering maniacs.’”One should analyze this allegation by referring to ano<strong>the</strong>r contemporary source.The following is an excerpt from a 1941 publication entitled Hōdō sensen [Front <strong>of</strong> MediaWarfare] by Mabuchi Itsuo:One prominent example is that <strong>the</strong> government <strong>of</strong> Chiang Kai-shek arousedanti-Japanese and pro-Chinese sentiment by disseminating a propagandaphoto that shows a Japanese soldier allegedly using a Chinese POW as aguinea pig for bayonet practice. But Lowdown magazine exposed <strong>the</strong> truth<strong>of</strong> this photograph. The magazine said in an article in its January 1939issue that this photograph had a long history <strong>of</strong> propaganda usage—firstagainst a warlord, against <strong>the</strong> Communists, and <strong>the</strong>n against <strong>the</strong> Japaneseduring <strong>the</strong> Manchurian Incident. It went on to say, “In its most recentreappearance it was used for <strong>the</strong> customary purpose <strong>of</strong> enlisting Americansympathies—and arousing anti-Japanese sentiment in this country.” Thistype <strong>of</strong> revelation proves to be counter-effective for <strong>the</strong> original purpose <strong>of</strong>propaganda. During World War , people believed an unfounded rumorthat <strong>the</strong> Germans extracted fat from <strong>the</strong> bodies <strong>of</strong> those killed in action toproduce soap. If someone had faked a photograph that depicted deadbodies being transported to a factory, it would have lent more credence to<strong>the</strong> story.163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!