11.07.2015 Views

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At <strong>the</strong> time, <strong>the</strong> Chinese Communists were desperately attempting to turnChiang Kai-shek’s military might on <strong>the</strong> Japanese. According Tokyo Sabin KyakkaMiteisyutu Bengogawa Shiryo [Defense Evidence Rejected by <strong>the</strong> International MilitaryTribunal for <strong>the</strong> Far East (IMTFE)] Vol.5 (p.505) edited by Tokyo Tribunal SourceMaterial Publishing Group, Mao Zedong <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CCP issued <strong>the</strong> “declaration <strong>of</strong> waragainst Japan” several times, beginning in 1932. From 1935 onward, he continued toappeal to <strong>the</strong> nation for <strong>the</strong> “expansion” <strong>of</strong> “anti-Japanese national war” as well as <strong>the</strong>“initiation <strong>of</strong> resistance war against Japan.”Then, one event changed <strong>the</strong> entire political picture in China. On December 12,1936, Chiang Kai-shek was visiting <strong>the</strong> city <strong>of</strong> Sian to encourage Zhang Xueliang, a son<strong>of</strong> Zhang Zuolin, to intensify his military <strong>of</strong>fensive against <strong>the</strong> Communists. Zhang,however, captured Chiang and put him under house arrest. Chiang Kai-shek was laterreleased when he agreed to terminate <strong>the</strong> GMD’s war against <strong>the</strong> Communists and givepriority to wage war against Japan. On July 7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following year, a military clashbetween <strong>the</strong> Japanese and <strong>the</strong> Chinese occurred in <strong>the</strong> area close to <strong>the</strong> Marco PoloBridge in a suburb <strong>of</strong> Beijing, and from this minor skirmish ultimately developed afull-scale war between <strong>the</strong> two countries.On <strong>the</strong> night <strong>of</strong> July 7, a Japanese army unit that was conducting a drill in <strong>the</strong>area, using blanks as usual instead <strong>of</strong> live ammunition. At 10:40 p.m., <strong>the</strong> Japanese unitcame under fire -- with live bullets. As historian Hata Ikuhiko said in his Rokōkyō Jikenno Kenkyu [Study on Marco Polo Bridge Incident] published in 1998, it was <strong>the</strong> men <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Chinese 29th Army that fired those shots. Had <strong>the</strong> Chinese troops opened fire onlyonce, <strong>the</strong>ir act could have been excused as an accident. Yet, because <strong>the</strong>y aimed shots atJapanese troops three more times <strong>the</strong>reafter, <strong>the</strong> commander <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Japanese troopsinterpreted it as an act <strong>of</strong> provocation. Finally on July 8, 5:30 a.m., after <strong>the</strong> Japanesetroops came under fire for <strong>the</strong> fourth time, <strong>the</strong>y launched a counterattack.Later in <strong>the</strong> same month, when a Japanese battalion was about to enter <strong>the</strong> city <strong>of</strong>Beijing to reinforce <strong>the</strong> Japanese garrison <strong>the</strong>re (which was <strong>the</strong>n comprised <strong>of</strong> only twocompanies) under an agreement reached with <strong>the</strong> Chinese authorities in <strong>the</strong> city, Chinesesoldiers closed one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city walls gates and fired upon <strong>the</strong>m. A Chinese securityforce stationed in Tongzhou <strong>the</strong>n massacred over 200 Japanese civilians living in <strong>the</strong> city.The Japanese government was ready to start negotiations in Shanghai on August9 with its Chinese counterpart to settle outstanding issues, including <strong>the</strong>se incidents. Atthis point, <strong>the</strong> Japanese leadership overall was not at all intent on expanding <strong>the</strong> militaryconflict in China.Then on that very day, <strong>the</strong> conflict spread to Shanghai when Lieutenant JuniorGrade Ōyama Isao and a sailor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Japanese Imperial Navy’s landing force were killedby <strong>the</strong> Chinese security force in <strong>the</strong> city. The resulting battle in Shanghai attractedinternational attention since <strong>the</strong> city also contained <strong>the</strong> international settlements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Western powers including Britain, <strong>the</strong> United States, France, and Italy. This was anideal environment for Chiang Kai-shek to fulfill his intention <strong>of</strong> promoting and exploitinganti-Japanese feeling among <strong>the</strong> Westerners, and he was ultimately successful.Protecting some 30,000 Japanese residents in Shanghai were only 2,500 <strong>of</strong>ficersand sailors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Japanese navy’s landing force. As for Chiang Kai-shek, he had issueda mobilization order earlier on July 12, and had ten divisions <strong>of</strong> his central army deployedin <strong>the</strong> Shanghai area even before <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Battle <strong>of</strong> Shanghai on August 9. By14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!