12.07.2015 Views

Bipolar Disorders: Mixed States, Rapid-Cycling, and Atypical Forms

Bipolar Disorders: Mixed States, Rapid-Cycling, and Atypical Forms

Bipolar Disorders: Mixed States, Rapid-Cycling, and Atypical Forms

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8Schizoaffective mixed statesAndreas Marneros, Stephan Röttig, Andrea Wenzel, Raffaela Blöink<strong>and</strong> Peter BriegerMartin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, GermanyIntroductionHardly any studies on schizoaffective mixed states exists. However, an exception isthe Cologne study carried out by Marneros et al. in the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s (Marneroset al., 1991). The rarity of research on schizoaffective mixed states is, on the oneh<strong>and</strong>, a paradox, but on the other h<strong>and</strong>, an underst<strong>and</strong>able phenomenon. Why aparadox? There are two reasons: first, while schizoaffective disorders are wellestablished as diagnostic categories in both Tenth Revision of the InternationalClassifi cati on of Diseases (ICD-10: World Health Organization, 1991) <strong>and</strong> Di ag no st ic<strong>and</strong> Statistical Manual of Mental <strong>Disorders</strong> (DSM-IV: American PsychiatricAssociation, 1994), it has also been determined that schizoaffective disordershave to be divided according to their mood component into unipolar <strong>and</strong> bipolartypes, a fact that implicates the occurrence of schizoaffective mixed states (AmericanPsychiatric Association, 1994; Marneros et al., 19 89a –c; 199 0a , ; b 1991; Marneros<strong>and</strong> Angst, 2000). Second, both diagnostic systems, ICD-10 <strong>and</strong> DSM-IV, define aschizoaffective mixed episode, as shown in Tables 8.1 <strong>and</strong> 8.2. Therefore,itistobe expected that clinicians <strong>and</strong> researchers applying either ICD-10 or DSM-IVcriteria diagnose schizoaffective mixed episode. But neither clinical nor practicalexperience, as well as a study of the literature, supports such an assumption.Then, why do these obvious deficits seem underst<strong>and</strong>able? Mainly due to tworeasons: first, the definition of schizoaffective disorders is – in spite of their longhistory <strong>and</strong> clinical reality – still diffuse <strong>and</strong> uncertain. Second, the clinical <strong>and</strong>psychopathological picture of schizoaffective mixed states is difficult for nonspecializedphysicians to detect.In such cases, schizophrenic, manic, <strong>and</strong> depressive symptoms form a ratherunclear <strong>and</strong> diffuse conglomerate – sometimes dominated by schizophrenicsymptoms, sometimes dominated by affective symptoms, each in a varying way.Sometimes the depressive symptomatology is very strong, hiding manic elements,# Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!