12.07.2015 Views

Bipolar Disorders: Mixed States, Rapid-Cycling, and Atypical Forms

Bipolar Disorders: Mixed States, Rapid-Cycling, and Atypical Forms

Bipolar Disorders: Mixed States, Rapid-Cycling, and Atypical Forms

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15 Beyond major depression <strong>and</strong> euphoric maniaKraepelin distinguished two groups of mixed states: (1) transitional forms,a stage in between, when depression changes to mania <strong>and</strong> vice versa; <strong>and</strong>(2) autonomic forms, a disorder on its own. Between these two groups relevantdifferences exist. The autonomic group is characterized by Kraepelin as the mostunfavorable form of manic-depressive insanity. The course is longer, with atendency to chronicity, <strong>and</strong> the individual episodes are longer than in othertypes of manic-depressive insanity (Kraepelin, 1899, 1904, 1913; Weyg<strong>and</strong>t,1899) – findings that were confirmed 100 years later. Also confirmed by somemodern studies are the findings of Kraepelin <strong>and</strong> Weyg<strong>and</strong>t:(1) Females are more frequently represented in groups of mixed states.(2) Using broad definitions, more than two-thirds of patients with manicdepressiveillness have a mixed state (usually a transitional form) at leastonce. Even when using narrow definitions, approximately 20% of themexperience mixed states (as many modern authors have also found, forexample, see Winokur et al., 1969; Himmelhoch et al., 1976a, b; Akiskal<strong>and</strong>Puzantian, 1979; Goodwin <strong>and</strong> Jamison, 1990; Marneros et al., 1991a, b,1996a, b; Akiskal, 1992; Himmelhoch, 1992; McElroy et al., 1995, 1997;Swann et al., 1995, 1997; Akiskal <strong>and</strong> Pinto, 2000)But even during the period after Kraepelin, in which the relevance of mixed statesfaded in scientific literature, many influential psychiatrists, such as Johannes Lange(1928) in Germany <strong>and</strong> Campbell (1953) in the English-speaking countries,continued to emphasize the relevance of mixed states.J. D. Campbell, in his book Manic-Depressive Disease: Clinical <strong>and</strong> PsychiatricSignificance, which was published exactly at the beginning of the psychopharmacologicalrevolution, but before its consequences, namely in 1953, emphasized theconceptual significance of mixed states in a way very similar to Kraepelin <strong>and</strong>Weyg<strong>and</strong>t:The mixed type of manic-depressive psychosis epitomizes the entire cyclothymic process, in thatit contains the symptoms characteristic of the various phases. Whether it is a sustained reactionor represents a phase of metamorphosis between the major forms, the mixed type emphasizesthe underlying similarities between the depressive <strong>and</strong> hypomanic, the fact that the manic <strong>and</strong>depressive reactions may be superimposed, <strong>and</strong> that the same individual possesses the potentialitiesfor either form.The renaissance of mixed statesThe renaissance of mixed states began in the USA at the end of the 1970s <strong>and</strong> thebeginning of the 1980s as a consequence of the pharmacological revolution inpsychiatry, especially through the contributions of Winokur et al. (1969), Kotin<strong>and</strong> Goodwin (1972), Himmelhoch et al.(1976a, b), Akiskal et al.(1979), Akiskal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!