The Challenge of Low-Carbon Development - World Bank Internet ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BibliographyAlix-Garcia, J. M., E. N. Shapiro and K. R. E. Sims. 2010.“The Impact of Payment for Ecosystem Services on Deforestationin Mexico: Preliminary Lessons for REDD.”Draft paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Andam, K. S., P. J. Ferraro, K. R. E. Sims, A. Healy, andMargaret B. Holland. 2010. “Protected Areas ReducedPoverty in Costa Rica and Thailand.” Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 107(22): 9996–10001.Antmann, Pedro. 2009. “Reducing Technical and Non-Technical Losses in the Power Sector.” BackgroundPaper, Energy Unit, World Bank, Washington, DC.Bhatia, B., and M. Gulati. 2004. “Reforming the Power Sector.Controlling Electricity Theft and Improving Revenue.”Public Policy Journal (Note 272).Capoor, Karan, and Philippe Ambrosi. 2009. “State andTrends of the Carbon Market 2009.” Carbon FinanceUnit Report, World Bank, Washington, DC.Chomitz, K. M. 2007. At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion,Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the TropicalForests. Washington, DC: World Bank.Clarke, L., J. Edmonds, V. Krey, R. Richels, S. Rose, andM. Tavoni. 2009. “International Climate Policy Architectures:Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios.”Energy Economics 31(Supplement 2): S64–S81.De Gouvello, C., F.B. Dayo, and M. Thioye. 2008. Low-Carbon Energy Projects for Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Unveiling the Potential, Addressing theBarriers. Washington, DC: World Bank.de Jager, D., and M. Rathmann. 2008. Policy InstrumentDesign to Reduce Financing Costs in RenewableEnergy Technology Projects. Utrecht, the Netherlands:Ecofys.Deichmann, U., C. Meisner, S. Murray, and D. Wheeler.2010. “The Economics of Renewable Energy Expansionin Rural Sub-Saharan Africa.” World Bank Policy ResearchWorking Paper No. 5193, Washington, DC.dos Santos, M. A., L. P. Rosa, B. Sikar, E. Sikar, and E. O.dos Santos. 2006. “Gross Greenhouse Gas Fluxes fromHydro-Power Reservoir Compared to Thermo-PowerPlants.” Energy Policy 34(4): 481–8.EEPC (Ethiopian Electric Power Corporation). 2009. Reporton Distribution of CFLs in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa:Ethiopian Electric Power Corporation.ESMAP (Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme).2009. “Large-Scale Residential EnergyEfficiency Programs Based on Compact FluorescentLamps.” http:// www.esmap.org.Ferry, S., and A. Cabraal. 2006. “Power Purchase Agreementsfor Small Power Producers.” ESMAP KnowledgeExchange Series, No. 7, Washington, DC.FTA (Federal Transit Administration). 2003. “Bus RapidTransit. Volume 1: Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit.”Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 90.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.GEF (Global Environment Fund). 2009. “Future StrategicPositioning of the GEF.” GEF/R.5/7/Rev.1. http://www.thegef.org.______. 2006a. “Post-Implementation Impact Assessment:World Bank GEF Energy Efficiency Projects SynthesisReport.” GEF Report, Washington, DC.______. 2006b. Thailand Promotion of Electrical EnergyEfficiency Project. Washington, DC: World Bank.______. 2004a. “Solar Photovoltaics in Africa—Experienceswith Financing and Delivery Models: Lessons for theFuture.” UNDP/World Bank Monitoring and EvaluationReport Series, Issue 2, Washington, DC.______. 2004b. “Climate Change Program Study.” GEF,Washington, DC. http://www.gefweb.org/COUNCIL/GEF_24/C.24.ME.Inf.2.pdf.______. 2003. “Reducing the Long-Term Costs of LowGreenhouse Gas-Emitting Energy Technologies.”http://207.190.239.143/Operational_Policies/Operational_Programs/OP_7_English.pdf.GEF Evaluation Office. 2010. “OPS4: Progress toward Impact.”Fourth Overall Performance Study of the GEF,World Bank, Washington, DC.______. 2009. “Assessing the Potential for ExperimentalEvaluation of Intervention Effects: The Case ofthe Regional Integrated Silvopastoral Approaches toEcosysytem Management Project.” Impact EvaluationInformation Document No. 15, Washington, DC.______. 2008. “Conceptual Framework: The Catalytic Roleof the GEF: How Is It Measured and Evaluated? Evaluationof the GEF Catalytic Role.” GEF Evaluation OfficePaper No. 18, Washington, DC.Gilbert, A. 2008. “Bus Rapid Transit: Is Transmilenio a MiracleCure?” Transport Reviews 28: 439–67.Greenpeace. 2006. “Eating Up the Amazon.” http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/eating-up-the-amazon.pdf.124 | Climate Change and the World Bank Group
Hartshorn, G., P. Ferraro, and B. Spergel. 2005. “Evaluationof the World Bank–GEF Ecomarkets Project inCost Rica.” North Carolina State University Evaluation,Raleigh, NC.Hertzmark, D. 2007. “Risk Assessment Methods for PowerUtility Planning.” Special Report Energy Sector ManagementAssistance Program of the World Bank, Washington,DC.IEA (International Energy Agency). 2009. World EnergyOutlook 2009. Paris: IEA/OECD.______. 2006. Light’s Labour’s Lost. Policies for EnergyefficientLighting. Paris: OECD/IEA.IEA, OPEC, OECD, World Bank. 2010. “Analysis of theScope of Energy Subsidies and Suggestions for the G-20Initiative.” Submission to the G-20 Summit Meeting,Toronto (Canada), June 26–27.IEG (Independent Evaluation Group). 2010a. Cost- BenefitAnalysis in World Bank Projects. Washington, DC:World Bank.______. 2010b. Energy Efficiency Finance: Assessing theImpact of IFC’s China Utility-Based Energy EfficiencyFinance Program. Washington, DC: World Bank.______. 2010c. Gender and Development: An Evaluation ofWorld Bank Support, 2002–08. Washington, DC: WorldBank.______. 2010d. Water and Development: An Evaluation ofWorld Bank Support, 1997–2007. Vol. 1. Washington,DC: World Bank.______. 2009. Climate Change and the World Bank Group.Phase I: An Evaluation of World Bank Win-Win EnergyPolicy Reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank.______. 2008. The Welfare Impact of Rural Electrification:A Reassessment of the Costs and Benefits: An IEG ImpactEvaluation. Washington, DC: World Bank.______. 2007. A Decade of Action in Transport: An Evaluationof World Bank Assistance to the Transport Sector,1995–2005. Washington, DC: World Bank.______. 2000. The World Bank Forest Strategy: Striking theRight Balance. Washington, DC: World Bank.IFC (International Finance Corporation). 2007. Selling Solar:Lessons from More than a Decade of IFC’s Experience.Washington, DC: World Bank.IIEC (International Institute for Energy Conservation).2006. “Overall EVN Phase 2 Program Monitoringand Evaluation Report for Electricity of Viet Nam(EVN).” Asia Office, International Institute for EnergyConservation.Iyadomi, Keisuke. 2010. “IGES CDM ERs CalculationSheet: Grid Emission Factor.” http://enviroscope.iges.or.jp/modules/envirolib/view.php?docid=2136.Karekezi, S., L. Majaro, and T. Johnson. 2003. ClimateChange Mitigation in the Urban Transport Sector: Prioritiesfor the World Bank. Washington, DC: World Bank.Lewis, J. I. 2010. “The Evolving Role of Carbon Finance inPromoting Renewable Energy Development in China.”Energy Policy 38(6): 2875–86.Martinot, E., R. Ramankutty, and R. Frank. 2000. The GEFSolar PV Portfolio Emerging Experience and Lessons.Washington, DC: World Bank.Maurer, L., and C. Nonay. 2009. “Output-Based Aid inEthiopia: Dealing with the ‘Last Mile’ Paradox in RuralElectrification.” OBApproaches (Note 27).Metz, B., P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds.). 2007.Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth AssessmentReport of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange: Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of ClimateChange. Cambridge, UK, and New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.MIGA (Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency). 2008.“Power Case Study: Maritza East 1, Bulgaria.” WorldBank, Washington, DC.Miller, D. 2009. Selling Solar. The Diffusion of Renewable Energyin Emerging Markets. London and Sterling, EarthscanPublications, Ltd.MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 2007. TheFuture of Coal: Options for a Carbon-constrained World.Cambridge, MA: MIT.Montzka, S. A., L. Kuijpers, M. O. Battle, M. Aydin, K. R.Verhulst, E. S. Saltzman, and D. W. Fahey. 2010. “RecentIncreases in Global HFC-23 Emissions.” Geophys. Res.Lett. 37(2): L02808.Mostert, W., K. Johnson, and J. MacLean. 2010. “PubliclyBacked Guarantees as Policy Instruments to PromoteClean Energy.” UNEP SEF Alliance, New York.Muñoz-Piña, C., A. Guevara, J. M. Torres, and J. Braña.2008. “Paying for the Hydrological Services of Mexico’sForests: Analysis, Negotiations and Results.” EcologicalEconomics 65(4): 725–36.Nakhooda, S. 2008. Correcting the World’s Greatest MarketFailure: Climate Change and the Multilateral DevelopmentBanks. Washington, DC: World ResourcesInstitute.NCSTE (National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation).2009. “Evaluation of the GEF Catalytic Role:Case Study of Energy Conservation and GHG: MissionReduction in Chinese Township and Village Enterprises—CaseStudy.” OPS4 Technical Document #3, GEFEvaluation Office, Washington DC.Neij, L. 2008. “Cost Development of Future Technologiesfor Power Generation—A Study Based on ExperienceCurves and Complementary Bottom-Up Assessments.”Energy Policy 36 (6): 2200–11.Nelson, A., and K. M. Chomitz. 2009. Protected Area Effectivenessin Reducing Tropical Deforestation: A GlobalAnalysis of the Impact of Protection Status. Washington,DC: World Bank, Independent Evaluation Group.Bibliography | 125
Page 1 and 2:
Phase II: The Challenge of Low-Carb
Page 3 and 4:
CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE WORLD BANK G
Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsAbbreviations . .
Page 7 and 8:
Figures1.1 GHG Emissions by Sector
Page 9 and 10:
AcknowledgmentsThe report was prepa
Page 11 and 12:
Executive SummaryUnabated, climate
Page 13 and 14:
esettlement plans has been ineffect
Page 15 and 16:
of some technologies, such as landf
Page 17 and 18:
Scale up high-impact investmentsEne
Page 19 and 20:
should have been strengthened in th
Page 21 and 22:
Major monitorable IEGrecommendation
Page 23 and 24:
Major monitorable IEGrecommendation
Page 25 and 26:
Chairman’s Summary: Committee onD
Page 27 and 28:
most places. Before we get there, w
Page 29 and 30:
non-Annex I countries. The World Ba
Page 31 and 32:
attention. In a couple of decades,
Page 33 and 34:
GlossaryAdditionalityBankabilityBas
Page 35 and 36:
Joint ImplementationA mechanism und
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 1evALuAtiOn HiGHLiGHts• T
Page 39 and 40:
of interventions, from technical as
Page 41 and 42:
would allow industrialized countrie
Page 43 and 44:
growth, poverty reduction (includin
Page 45 and 46:
Table 1.1 Map of the EvaluationSect
Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 2eValuaTION HIGHlIGHTS• W
Page 49 and 50:
Table 2.2Evaluated World Bank Renew
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2.2Breakdown of 2003-08 Low-
Page 53 and 54:
Table 2.4 Commitments to Grid-Conne
Page 55 and 56:
Box 2.1The Economics of Grid-Connec
Page 57 and 58:
on average (Iyadomi 2010). (Reducti
Page 59 and 60:
and industrial policy. An increasin
Page 61 and 62:
Table 2.6Hydropower Investments by
Page 63 and 64:
costs for remaining unelectrified a
Page 65 and 66:
World Bank experienceTwo factors ac
Page 67:
Box 2.5On-Grid and Off-Grid Renewab
Page 70 and 71:
Energy EfficiencyThe first phase in
Page 72 and 73:
Box 3.1ESCOs and Energy Performance
Page 74 and 75:
have had limited causal impact on t
Page 76 and 77:
measurement of achieved economic re
Page 78 and 79:
Since the early 1990s, public entit
Page 80 and 81:
part with a $198 million IDA credit
Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 4eVAluATioN HigHligHTS• B
Page 85 and 86:
The WBG urban transport portfolio (
Page 87 and 88:
y conventional transport systems, i
Page 89 and 90:
include the forest carbon projects
Page 91 and 92:
for Costa Rica for the period 2000-
Page 93 and 94:
After 20 years of effort, systemati
Page 95 and 96:
orrowers have demonstrated the abil
Page 97 and 98:
Chapter 5EVALuATioN HigHLigHTS• O
Page 99 and 100:
Consequently, the efficiency with w
Page 101 and 102:
technologies could accelerate diffu
Page 103 and 104:
A second issue, inherent to any adv
Page 105 and 106:
goal of promoting wind turbine impr
Page 107 and 108:
ConclusionsThe WBG’s efforts to p
Page 109 and 110: Table 5.1Carbon Funds at the World
Page 111 and 112: demonstration initiative. The Commu
Page 113 and 114: Impacts on technology transferThe 2
Page 115 and 116: Chapter 6Photo by Martin Wright/Ash
Page 117 and 118: Figure 6.1800Economic and Carbon Re
Page 119 and 120: Specifically, the WBG could:• Pla
Page 121 and 122: Table 6.1Summary of Sectoral Findin
Page 123 and 124: Table 6.1Sector Intervention Direct
Page 125 and 126: Appendix ARenewable Energy Tables a
Page 127 and 128: Table A.4Grid-Based Biomass/Biogass
Page 129 and 130: Table A.5 (continued)Negative examp
Page 131 and 132: Figure A.4A. Hydro/biomass capacity
Page 133 and 134: Appendix bWorld Bank Experience wit
Page 135 and 136: Table C.2Completed Low-Carbon Energ
Page 137 and 138: TAble C.4Reviewed energy efficiency
Page 139 and 140: the new capacity. Transmission syst
Page 141 and 142: Table E.2Climate obligationsCoal Pl
Page 143 and 144: Table F.2GHG objectiveModeNumber of
Page 145 and 146: IEG eliminated a few cases of doubl
Page 147 and 148: Table H.1Project andlocationBioener
Page 149 and 150: Appendix ICarbon and Economic Retur
Page 151 and 152: Appendix JRecent WBG Developments i
Page 153 and 154: y providing value to standing fores
Page 155 and 156: never had an explicit corporate str
Page 157 and 158: overnight. The Bank can provide ass
Page 159: Chapter 51. From the chief economis
Page 163 and 164: ______. 2007. World Development Ind
Page 165 and 166: IEG PublicationsAnalyzing the Effec
show all

The Challenge of Low-Carbon Development - World Bank Internet ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?