12.07.2015 Views

The Challenge of Low-Carbon Development - World Bank Internet ...

The Challenge of Low-Carbon Development - World Bank Internet ...

The Challenge of Low-Carbon Development - World Bank Internet ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

costs for remaining unelectrified areas exceeding $0.50/kWh because <strong>of</strong> small loads, <strong>of</strong>f-grid supply may be theleast cost alternative.Off-Grid Renewable Energy: SolarPhotovoltaicsThis section focuses on SHS—historically the biggestrecipient <strong>of</strong> WBG support for <strong>of</strong>f-grid renewable energyand still prominent in the portfolio (table 2.5). SHSsprovide individual rural households with modest levels<strong>of</strong> power primarily for lighting and television. SHSs canr educe carbon emissions by substituting for kerosenelamps and grid-charged batteries. Because they promiseboth rural access and GHG reductions, they have attractedsubstantial funding.Since 1992, the WBG has contributed$790 million to SHS components.Barriers and interventions<strong>The</strong> barriers to SHS are well established:• Cost and financing for consumers: <strong>The</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> a 20-peakwatt (Wp) system ranged from $150 to $490 in the portfolio.Although the operating cost per lumen (unit <strong>of</strong> illumination)is theoretically less than that <strong>of</strong> a kerosene lamp,the up-front cost is prohibitive for most rural poor withoutfinancing. And rural finance poses its own problems.• Financing for manufacturers and dealers: SHS systemsare assembled by small manufacturers that find it difficultto get capital.• Biased pricing policies: In Sri Lanka, for instance, solarphotovoltaic modules were initially subject to 35 percentimport duties. In Indonesia, when the price <strong>of</strong>photovoltaic systems increased by 400 percent due tocurrency depreciation, the import price <strong>of</strong> keroseneand diesel only increased by 40 percent and 58 percent,respectively, thanks to government subsidies. InUganda, solar purchases were subject to extra dutiesaimed at protecting a local battery company.Photo by Dana Smillie, courtesy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Photo Library.Since 1992, the WBG has contributed $790 million to SHScomponents in 33 <strong>Bank</strong> and 4 IFC projects in 34 countries.Virtually all had some degree <strong>of</strong> GEF support. <strong>The</strong> portfoliois concentrated in East Asia and the Pacific and Africa.<strong>The</strong> Middle East and North Africa is represented only bya $1 million project in Morocco, despite the region’s solarresource.This section draws on a review <strong>of</strong> the 12 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> projectsthat contain an <strong>of</strong>f-grid solar photovoltaic component andwere closed or open and well documented, and that have aninstallation target greater than 10,000 SHSs (see table A.7).• Anticipation <strong>of</strong> grid connection: Households much preferthe convenience and reliability <strong>of</strong> grid connections andwill not invest large sums in SHS if connection to the gridis imminent. Ambiguous plans or too-optimistic promiseson grid integration can discourage demand for SHS.• Poor quality—actual or perceived: Uncertainty aboutSHS quality and reliability dampens consumer demandfor these expensive investments; uncertainty about consumerdemand dampens industry supply.Geographic barriers• : Off-grid populations tend to be inareas <strong>of</strong> low population density with difficult terrain.Renewable Energy | 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!